CELEX:62020TJ0006: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Dr. Spiller GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-6/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin11 February, 2022
CELEX:62020TO0682: Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 December 2021.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-682/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin11 February, 2022
CELEX:62020CJ0009: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#Grundstücksgemeinschaft Kollaustraße 136 v Finanzamt Hamburg-Oberalster.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 66 – Chargeability of VAT – The time the payment is received – Article 167 – Origin and scope of the right of input VAT deduction – Article 167a – Derogation – Cash accounting – Letting and subletting of a property used for industrial or commercial purposes.#Case C-9/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin11 February, 2022
CELEX:62020CJ0009: Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 10. februarja 2022.#Grundstücksgemeinschaft Kollaustraße 136 proti Finanzamt Hamburg-Oberalster.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Finanzgericht Hamburg.#Predhodno odločanje – Obdavčenje – Davek na dodano vrednost (DDV) – Direktiva 2006/112/ES – Člen 66, prvi odstavek, točka (b) – Obveznost obračuna DDV – Prejem plačila – Člen 167 – Nastanek in obseg pravice do odbitka vstopnega DDV – Člen 167a – Odstopanje – Obračunavanje DDV po plačani realizaciji – Najem in podnajem nepremičnine, ki je namenjena industrijski ali komercialni uporabi.#Zadeva C-9/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy Admin Zdss P11 February, 2022
CELEX:62021CO0672: Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 4 février 2022.#Eos Products Sàrl contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission.#Affaire C-672/21 P. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin11 February, 2022This document does not exist in English.
CELEX:62021CO0121(03): Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 February 2022.#Czech Republic v Republic of Poland.#Case C-121/21. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin10 February, 2022
CELEX:62019TJ0791: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 February 2022.#Sped-Pro S.A. v European Commission.#Case T-791/19. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin10 February, 2022
CELEX:62020CJ0009: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#Grundstücksgemeinschaft Kollaustraße 136 v Finanzamt Hamburg-Oberalster.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 66 – Chargeability of VAT – The time the payment is received – Article 167 – Origin and scope of the right of input VAT deduction – Article 167a – Derogation – Cash accounting – Letting and subletting of a property used for industrial or commercial purposes.#Case C-9/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin10 February, 2022
CELEX:62020CJ0485: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#XXXX v HR Rail SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of disability – Dismissal of a worker who had become permanently incapable of performing the essential functions of the post – Staff member completing training as part of recruitment – Article 5 – Reasonable accommodation for people with disabilities – Requirement to reassign to another post – Obligation subject to it not being a disproportionate burden for the employer.#Case C-485/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin10 February, 2022
CELEX:62020CJ0522: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#OE v VY.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Validity – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction to hear and determine an application for divorce – Article 18 TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Fifth and sixth indents of Article 3(1)(a) – Difference between the length of the residence period required for the purposes of determining which court has jurisdiction – Distinction between a resident who is a national of the Member State of the court before which the application is brought and a resident who is not a national of that Member State – No discrimination on grounds of nationality.#Case C-522/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin10 February, 2022