CELEX:62021CO0474: Order of the Court of 8 December 2021.#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-474/21 P. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 December, 2021
CELEX:62021CO0473: Order of the Court of 8 December 2021.#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-473/21 P. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 December, 2021
CELEX:62016TJ0693(01): Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 15 décembre 2021 (Extraits).#HG contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Affectation dans un pays tiers – Logement familial mis à disposition par l’administration – Non-respect de l’obligation d’y résider en famille – Procédure disciplinaire – Sanction disciplinaire de suspension d’avancement d’échelon – Réparation du préjudice subi par l’Union – Article 22 du statut – Rejet du recours au fond – Annulation sur pourvoi – Arrêt sur pourvoi réexaminé par la Cour et annulé – Renvoi au Tribunal.#Affaire T-693/16 P RENV-RX. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 December, 2021This document does not exist in English.
CELEX:62021CO0475: Order of the Court of 8 December 2021.#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-475/21 P. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 December, 2021
CELEX:62020TJ0404: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Global Translation Solutions ltd v European Commission.#Case T-404/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 December, 2021
CELEX:62020TJ0637: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Dermavita Company SARL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-637/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 December, 2021
CELEX:62018TJ0655: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 October 2021.#Delphine Aupicon and Others v European External Action Service.#Case T-655/18. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 December, 2021
CELEX:62020TJ0124: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#M/S. Indeutsch International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-124/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 December, 2021
CELEX:62020TJ0397: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Allergan Holdings France SAS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-397/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 December, 2021
CELEX:62020TJ0636: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Dermavita Company SARL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-636/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 December, 2021