CELEX:62021CJ0404: Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 22. decembra 2022.#WP proti Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale in Repubblica italiana.#Predhodno odločanje – Osebje Evropske centralne banke (ECB) – Prenos pokojninskih pravic, pridobljenih v nacionalnem pokojninskem sistemu, v pokojninski sistem ECB – Člen 4(3) PEU – Načelo lojalnega sodelovanja – Pogoji za zaposlitev v ECB – Člen 8 Priloge IIIa – Neobstoj določbe nacionalnega prava ali sporazuma, sklenjenega med zadevno državo članico in ECB.#Zadeva C-404/21. EUR LEX - RSSBy Admin Zdss P17 January, 2023
CELEX:62021CJ0753: Sodba Sodišča (osmi senat) z dne 15. decembra 2022.#Instrubel NV in Montana Management Inc. proti Montana Management Inc. in drugi.#Predhodno odločanje – Skupna zunanja in varnostna politika – Uredba (ES) št. 1210/2003 – Posebne omejitve gospodarskih in finančnih odnosov z Irakom – Člen 4 – Zamrznitev sredstev in gospodarskih virov, ki pripadajo osebam, organizacijam in entitetam, povezanim z režimom nekdanjega predsednika Sadama Huseina – Člen 6 – Prenos na mehanizme nasledstva Razvojnega sklada za Irak – Lastništvo zamrznjenih sredstev in gospodarskih virov.#Združeni zadevi C-753/21 in C-754/21. EUR LEX - RSSBy Admin Zdss P17 January, 2023
CELEX:62020CJ0632: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 17 janvier 2023.#Royaume d’Espagne contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Relations extérieures – Accord de stabilisation et d’association entre l’Union européenne et la Communauté européenne de l’énergie atomique, d’une part, et le Kosovo, d’autre part – Communications électroniques – Règlement (UE) 2018/1971 – Organe des régulateurs européens des communications électroniques (ORECE) – Article 35, paragraphe 2 – Participation de l’autorité de régulation du Kosovo à cet organe – Notions de “pays tiers” et d’“État tiers” – Compétence de la Commission européenne.#Affaire C-632/20 P. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin17 January, 2023This document does not exist in English.
CELEX:62022CO0559: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 December 2022.#Vtesse Harlow Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Refusal of the European Commission to initiate proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations – Discretion of the Commission – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-559/22 P. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin17 January, 2023
CELEX:62020CJ0702: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#SIA „DOBELES HES” and Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija v Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – National legislation imposing an obligation on the public operator to purchase from renewable energy producers at a price higher than the market price – Failure to pay a portion of the aid concerned – Application for compensation submitted by those producers to a public authority distinct from that which is, in principle, required, under that national legislation, to pay that aid and whose budget is intended solely to ensure its own operation – New aid – Notification requirement – De minimis aid – Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 – Article 5(2) – Cumulation – Taking into account the amounts of aid already received during the reference period on the basis of that national legislation.#Joined Cases C-702/20 and C-17/21. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 January, 2023
CELEX:62020CJ0702: Sodba Sodišča (veliki senat) z dne 12. januarja 2023.#SIA „DOBELES HES” in Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija proti Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija in drugi.#Predloga(i) za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki sta ju vložili Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Predhodno odločanje – Državne pomoči – Člen 107(1) PDEU – Nacionalna ureditev, ki javnemu subjektu nalaga obveznost, da se oskrbuje pri proizvajalcih električne energije iz obnovljivih virov po višji ceni, kot je tržna – Neizplačilo dela zadevne pomoči – Zahtevek za nadomestilo, ki sta ga ta proizvajalca vložila pri javnem organu, ki je ločen od tistega, ki je načeloma na podlagi te nacionalne ureditve to pomoč dolžan izplačati, in katerega proračun je namenjen le zagotovitvi njegovega delovanja – Nova pomoč – Obveznost priglasitve – Pomoč de minimis – Uredba (EU) št. 1407/2013 – Člen 5(2) – Kumulacija – Upoštevanje zneskov pomoči, ki so že bili prejeti v referenčnem obdobju na podlagi navedene nacionalne ureditve.#Združeni zadevi C-702/20 in C-17/21. EUR LEX - RSSBy Admin Zdss P16 January, 2023
CELEX:62022CN0337: Case C-337/22 P: Appeal brought on 23 May 2022 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 16 March 2022 in Case T-281/21, Nowhere v EUIPO EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 January, 2023
CELEX:62021CN0561: Case C-561/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 10 September 2021 — GP and BG v Banco Santander, S. A. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 January, 2023
CELEX:62022CB0302: Case C-302/22: Order of the Court (Eight Chamber) of 3 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Eilenburg — Germany) — YS, RW v Freebird Airlines Europe Ltd. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Compensation for air passengers in the event of long delays to flights — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Extraordinary circumstances — Collision between an aircraft and birds — Emergency braking manoeuvre leading to damage to the tyres of that aircraft) EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 January, 2023
CELEX:62022CB0056: Case C-56/22: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — PL v État belge (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility) EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 January, 2023