Author Archives: admin

CELEX:62021CN0489: Case C-489/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 6 August 2021 — Banka DSK EAD v M. V.

CELEX:62020CA0299: Case C-299/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Icade Promotion SAS, formerly Icade Promotion Logement SAS v Ministère de l’Action et des Comptes publics (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 392 — Margin taxation scheme — Scope — Supply of buildings and building land purchased for resale — Taxable person for whom the VAT on the purchase of buildings was not deductible — Resale subject to VAT — Concept of ‘building land’)

CELEX:62021CN0451: Case C-451/21 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2021 by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 12 May 2021 in Joined Cases T-516/18 and T-525/18, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and Engie Global LNG Holding and Others v Commission

CELEX:62020CA0296: Case C-296/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Commerzbank AG v E.O. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments — Civil and commercial matters — Lugano II Convention — Article 15(1)(c) — Jurisdiction over consumer contracts — Transfer of the consumer’s domicile to another State bound by the convention)

CELEX:62019CA0598: Case C-598/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia del País Vasco — Spain) — Confederación Nacional de Centros Especiales de Empleo (Conacee) v Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 20 — Reserved contracts — National legislation reserving the right to participate in certain public procurement procedures to Social initiative special employment centres — Additional conditions not provided for by the directive — Principles of equal treatment and proportionality)

CELEX:62020CA0285: Case C-285/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — K v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 65(2) and (5) — Scope — Wholly unemployed worker — Unemployment benefits — Worker who resides and pursues an activity as an employed person in the competent Member State — Transfer of his or her residence to another Member State — Person not actually pursuing an activity as an employed person in the competent Member State before becoming wholly unemployed — Person on sick leave and receiving, on that basis, sickness benefits paid by the competent Member State — Pursuit of an activity as an employed person — Comparable legal situations)

CELEX:62019CA0561: Case C-561/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Consorzio Italian Management, Catania Multiservizi SpA v Rete Ferroviaria Italiana SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling — Exceptions to that obligation — Criteria — Question on the interpretation of EU law raised by the parties to the national proceedings after the Court has given a preliminary ruling in those proceedings — Failure to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Partial inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

CELEX:62019CA0544: Case C-544/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Blagoevgrad — Bulgaria) — ‘ECOTEX BULGARIA’ EOOD v Teritorialna direktsia na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite — Sofia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 63 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Directive (EU) 2015/849 — Scope — National legislation requiring payments exceeding a certain amount to be made only by transfer or deposit into a payment account — Article 65 TFEU — Justification — Combating tax evasion and tax avoidance — Proportionality — Administrative penalties of a criminal nature — Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties)

CELEX:62019CA0487: Case C-487/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — Proceedings brought by W.Ż. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rule of law — Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Transfer without consent of a judge of an ordinary court — Action — Order of inadmissibility made by a judge of the Sąd Najwyższy (Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych) (Supreme Court (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs), Poland) — Judge appointed by the President of the Republic of Poland on the basis of a resolution of the National Council of the Judiciary, despite a court decision ordering that the effects of that resolution be suspended pending a preliminary ruling of the Court — Judge not constituting an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law — Primacy of EU law — Possibility of finding such an order of inadmissibility to be null and void)

CELEX:62019CA0538: Case C-538/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa — Romania) — TS, UT, VU v Casa Naţională de Asigurări de Sănătate, Casa de Asigurări de Sănătate Constanţa (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Sickness insurance — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 20(1) and (2) — Medical treatment received in a Member State other than that in which the insured person resides — Prior authorisation — Conditions — Requirement for a report prescribing treatment, drawn up by a doctor of the national public sickness insurance scheme — Prescription, by way of a second medical opinion, drawn up in a Member State other than that in which the insured person resides, of an alternative treatment which has the advantage of not causing a disability — Full reimbursement of the medical expenses incurred in respect of that alternative treatment — Freedom to provide services — Article 56 TFEU)