Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....
CELEX:62020CJ0582: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#SC Cridar Cons SRL v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Cluj and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Case C-582/20.
1 March, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62021CJ0052: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Pharmacie populaire – La Sauvegarde SCRL and Pharma Santé – Réseau Solidaris SCRL v État belge and État belge SPF Justice.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Liège.#Joined Cases C-52/21 and C-53/21.
1 March, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020CJ0536: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#UAB „Tiketa“ v M. Š. and VšĮ „Baltic Music“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/83/EU – Consumer contracts – Concept of ‘trader’ – Obligation to provide information in respect of distance contracts – Requirement that the necessary information be provided in plain and intelligible language and on a durable medium.#Case C-536/20.
1 March, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020CJ0605: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Suzlon Wind Energy Portugal – Energia Eólica Unipessoal, Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Case C-605/20.
1 March, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020CO0539(01): Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 22 février 2022.#Hochmann Marketing GmbH contre Commission européenne.#Demande en révision – Article 159 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Conditions – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-539/20 P-REV.
1 March, 2022
No Comments
This document does not exist in English.
CELEX:62021CO0679: Order of the Court of 22 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-679/21 P.
1 March, 2022
No Comments
- Blog o davkih – članki(42)
- CFE novice(14)
- Državni zbor RS – zakoni(4078)
- EUR LEX – RSS(86946)
- FURS novice fizične osebe – RSS(35764)
- Izjave ZDSS za javnost(16)
- Izobraževanja in izobraževalni dogodki ZDSS(86)
- Novice DFP(50)
- Novice in stališča ZDSS-ja (izjave za javnost, strokovna stališča)(59)
- Novice RSS FURS podjetja(62495)
- Novice sodbe slovenskih sodišč DAVKI RSS(1479)
- Novice ZDSS – razpisi in druge koristne informacije(12)
- Novice ZDSS (Dogodki, obvestila…) – vsa lastna obvestila ZDSS(200)
- Obvestila ZDSS – delovanje organov ZDSS(18)
- Strokovna mnenja ZDSS(7)
- ZDSS v drugih medijih(4)
Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?
Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko