Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....
CELEX:62020CJ0009: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#Grundstücksgemeinschaft Kollaustraße 136 v Finanzamt Hamburg-Oberalster.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 66 – Chargeability of VAT – The time the payment is received – Article 167 – Origin and scope of the right of input VAT deduction – Article 167a – Derogation – Cash accounting – Letting and subletting of a property used for industrial or commercial purposes.#Case C-9/20.
February 10, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020CJ0485: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#XXXX v HR Rail SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of disability – Dismissal of a worker who had become permanently incapable of performing the essential functions of the post – Staff member completing training as part of recruitment – Article 5 – Reasonable accommodation for people with disabilities – Requirement to reassign to another post – Obligation subject to it not being a disproportionate burden for the employer.#Case C-485/20.
February 10, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020CJ0522: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#OE v VY.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Validity – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction to hear and determine an application for divorce – Article 18 TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Fifth and sixth indents of Article 3(1)(a) – Difference between the length of the residence period required for the purposes of determining which court has jurisdiction – Distinction between a resident who is a national of the Member State of the court before which the application is brought and a resident who is not a national of that Member State – No discrimination on grounds of nationality.#Case C-522/20.
February 10, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020CJ0595: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#UE v ShareWood Switzerland AG and VF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Law applicable to contractual obligations – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) – Consumer contracts – Choice of applicable law – Article 6(4)(c) – Exclusion of contracts relating to a right in rem in immovable property or to a tenancy of immovable property – Contract of sale, including a lease agreement and a service agreement, relating to trees planted for the sole purpose of being harvested for profit.#Case C-595/20.
February 10, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020CJ0219: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#LM v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld and Österreichische Gesundheitskasse.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Posting of workers – Directive 96/71/EC – Article 3(1)(c) – Terms and conditions of employment – Remuneration – Article 5 – Penalties – Limitation period – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Right to good administration – Article 47 – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-219/20.
February 10, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020CJ0499: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#DIMCO Dimovasili M.I.K.E. v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 97/23/EC – Pressure equipment – CE marking – Placing on the market and putting into service – Restrictions aimed at ensuring the protection of persons – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – National legislation imposing restrictions on the method of installation of gas pipes.#Case C-499/20.
February 10, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020CC0596: Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 10 February 2022.###
February 10, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020CJ0522: Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 10 février 2022.#OE contre VY.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Validité – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Compétence pour connaître d’une demande en divorce – Article 18 TFUE – Règlement (CE) no 2201/2003 – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous a), cinquième et sixième tirets – Différence entre les durées de période de résidence exigées pour déterminer la juridiction compétente – Distinction entre un résident ressortissant de l’État membre de la juridiction saisie et un résident non ressortissant de celui‑ci – Discrimination en raison de la nationalité – Absence.#Affaire C-522/20.
February 10, 2022
No Comments
This document does not exist in English.
- Blog o davkih – članki(42)
- CFE novice(14)
- Državni zbor RS – zakoni(3415)
- EUR LEX – RSS(18782)
- FURS novice fizične osebe – RSS(11479)
- Izjave ZDSS za javnost(15)
- Izobraževanja in izobraževalni dogodki ZDSS(55)
- Novice DFP(32)
- Novice in stališča ZDSS-ja (izjave za javnost, strokovna stališča)(60)
- Novice RSS FURS podjetja(20103)
- Novice sodbe slovenskih sodišč DAVKI RSS(1069)
- Novice ZDSS – razpisi in druge koristne informacije(12)
- Novice ZDSS (Dogodki, obvestila…) – vsa lastna obvestila ZDSS(134)
- Obvestila ZDSS – delovanje organov ZDSS(18)
- Strokovna mnenja ZDSS(6)
- ZDSS v drugih medijih(4)
Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?
Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko