eurlex – Page 1040 – ZDSS

Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62021TB0124: Case T-124/21: Order of the General Court of 30 September 2021 — Mariani and Others v Parliament (Action for annulment — Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2223 — Cooperation with the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the effectiveness of OLAF investigations — Act not of individual concern — Non-regulatory act — Inadmissibility)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TB0633: Case T-633/20: Order of the General Court of 27 September 2021 — CNMSE and Others v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Public health — Regulation (EU) 2020/1043 — Conduct of clinical trials with medicinal products for human use containing GMOs — Treatment or prevention of the coronavirus disease SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) — Concept of legislative act — Concept of regulatory act — No individual concern — Inadmissibility)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TB0648: Case T-648/20: Order of the General Court of 28 September 2021 — NB v Court of Justice of the European Union (Action for annulment — Civil service — Decision not to appoint the applicant to grade AST 10 — Time limit for lodging a complaint — Delay — Manifest inadmissibility)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62021TA0045: Case T-45/21: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Ciano Trading & Services CT & S and Others v Commission (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Sustainable restoration for the Commission in Brussels and its surroundings — Annulment of the tendering procedure — Legitimate expectations — Abuse of rights)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0733: Case T-733/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Freundlieb v EUIPO (BANDIT) (EU trade mark — EU word mark BANDIT — Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration — Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty of care — No review — Failure to comply with time limits)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0712: Case T-712/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Škoda Investment v EUIPO — Škoda Auto (Representation of an arrow with wing) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing an arrow with wing — Earlier EU figurative mark representing an arrow with wing — Relative ground for refusal — Partial rejection of the opposition — Limited scope of the opposition in the context of the appeal before the Board of Appeal — Partial withdrawal of the opposition — Plea raised by the Board of Appeal of its own motion — Prohibition on ruling ultra petita)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0732: Case T-732/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Freundlieb v EUIPO (CRYSTAL) (EU trade mark — EU word mark CRYSTAL — Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration — Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty of care — No review — Failure to comply with time limits)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0668: Case T-668/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — NZ v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Recruitment — Internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 — Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the competition reserve list — Obligation to state reasons — Secrecy of the proceedings of the selection board — Broad discretionary power of the selection board — Failure to communicate the intermediate marks and the weighting of the components of the oral test)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0591: Case T-591/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Unimax Stationery v EUIPO — Mitsubishi Pencil (UNI-MAX) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark UNI-MAX — Earlier EU figurative marks uni and uni-ball — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0436: Case T-436/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Sedus Stoll v EUIPO — Kappes (Sedus ergo+) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ — Earlier national and international word marks ERGOPLUS — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

December 6, 2021 No Comments

Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?

Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

Kdaj portal www.zdss.si pošilja obvestila?

Glej Tehnična opis delovanja spletne strani.