Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....
CELEX:62020TA0712: Case T-712/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Škoda Investment v EUIPO — Škoda Auto (Representation of an arrow with wing) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing an arrow with wing — Earlier EU figurative mark representing an arrow with wing — Relative ground for refusal — Partial rejection of the opposition — Limited scope of the opposition in the context of the appeal before the Board of Appeal — Partial withdrawal of the opposition — Plea raised by the Board of Appeal of its own motion — Prohibition on ruling ultra petita)
December 6, 2021
No Comments
CELEX:62020TA0732: Case T-732/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Freundlieb v EUIPO (CRYSTAL) (EU trade mark — EU word mark CRYSTAL — Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration — Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty of care — No review — Failure to comply with time limits)
December 6, 2021
No Comments
CELEX:62020TA0668: Case T-668/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — NZ v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Recruitment — Internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 — Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the competition reserve list — Obligation to state reasons — Secrecy of the proceedings of the selection board — Broad discretionary power of the selection board — Failure to communicate the intermediate marks and the weighting of the components of the oral test)
December 6, 2021
No Comments
CELEX:62020TA0591: Case T-591/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Unimax Stationery v EUIPO — Mitsubishi Pencil (UNI-MAX) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark UNI-MAX — Earlier EU figurative marks uni and uni-ball — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
December 6, 2021
No Comments
CELEX:62020TA0436: Case T-436/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Sedus Stoll v EUIPO — Kappes (Sedus ergo+) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ — Earlier national and international word marks ERGOPLUS — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
December 6, 2021
No Comments
CELEX:62020TA0523: Case T-523/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Setarcos Consulting v EUIPO (Blockchain Island) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark Blockchain Island — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
December 6, 2021
No Comments
CELEX:62020TA0429: Case T-429/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Sedus Stoll v EUIPO — Kappes (Sedus ergo+) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ — Earlier national word mark ERGOPLUS — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
December 6, 2021
No Comments
CELEX:62020TA0219: Case T-219/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — JK v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Commission staff working for the EEAS — Request for assistance — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Implied decision rejecting the request — Decision rejecting the complaint — Article 90 of the Staff Regulations — Competent Appointing Authority — Principle of sound administration)
December 6, 2021
No Comments
CELEX:62020TA0121: Case T-121/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — IP v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — OLAF investigation — Reimbursement of medical expenses — Disciplinary penalty — Termination of contract without notice — Article 10(h) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Reoffending — Article 27 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Decision granting a request that no mention of a previous penalty remain in the personal file — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations — Sanction cannot be enforced or invoked against the official if no mention of it remains in the personal file)
December 6, 2021
No Comments
- Blog o davkih – članki(42)
- CFE novice(14)
- Državni zbor RS – zakoni(4078)
- EUR LEX – RSS(23765)
- FURS novice fizične osebe – RSS(15297)
- Izjave ZDSS za javnost(16)
- Izobraževanja in izobraževalni dogodki ZDSS(61)
- Novice DFP(36)
- Novice in stališča ZDSS-ja (izjave za javnost, strokovna stališča)(61)
- Novice RSS FURS podjetja(27491)
- Novice sodbe slovenskih sodišč DAVKI RSS(1187)
- Novice ZDSS – razpisi in druge koristne informacije(12)
- Novice ZDSS (Dogodki, obvestila…) – vsa lastna obvestila ZDSS(148)
- Obvestila ZDSS – delovanje organov ZDSS(18)
- Strokovna mnenja ZDSS(7)
- ZDSS v drugih medijih(4)
Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?
Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko