Novice ZDSS – sodbe, obvestila FURS – Page 4658 – ZDSS

Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62021CJ0243: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Vierte Kammer) vom 17. November 2022.#„TOYA“ sp. z o.o. und Polska Izba Informatyki i Telekomunikacji gegen Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Telekommunikation – Richtlinie 2002/19/EG (Zugangsrichtlinie) – Art. 8 Abs. 3 – Richtlinie 2014/61/EU – Art. 1 Abs. 3 und 4 und Art. 3 Abs. 5 – Befugnis der nationalen Regulierungsbehörde, regulatorische Vorabverpflichtungen für den Zugang zur physischen Infrastruktur eines Netzbetreibers ohne beträchtliche Marktmacht aufzuerlegen – Fehlen eines Rechtsstreits über den Zugang.#Rechtssache C-243/21.

November 17, 2022 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62021CJ0175: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Harman International Industries, Inc. v AB SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Free movement of goods – Intellectual property – EU trade mark – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 15 – Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark – Placing on the market within the European Economic Area (EEA) – Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark – Place of first marketing of products by the proprietor of the trade mark or with its consent – Proof – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Operative part of judicial decisions not identifying the products covered – Difficulties in implementation – Restricted scope of action before the competent court for enforcement – Fair trial – Rights of the defence – Principle of the equality of arms.#Case C-175/21.

November 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62020CJ0253: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Impexeco N.V. and PI Pharma NV v Novartis AG and Novartis Pharma NV.#References for a preliminary ruling – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Free movement of goods – Intellectual property – Trade marks – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 9(2) – Article 13 – Directive 2008/95 – Article 5(1) – Article 7 – Rights conferred by a trade mark – Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark – Parallel imports of medicinal products – Reference medicinal product and generic medicinal product – Economically linked undertakings – Repackaging of the generic medicinal product – New outer packaging – Affixing the trade mark of the reference medicinal product – Opposition by the proprietor of the trade mark – Artificial partitioning of the markets between the Member States.#Joined Cases C-253/20 and C-254/20.

November 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CJ0304: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#VT v Ministero dell’Interno and Ministero dell’interno – Dipartimento della Pubblica Sicurezza – Direzione centrale per le risorse umane.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 2(2), Article 4(1) and Article 6(1) – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – National legislation fixing a maximum age limit of 30 years for the recruitment of police commissioners – Justification.#Case C-304/21.

November 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CJ0350: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 17 novembre 2022.##Renvoi préjudiciel – Traitement des données à caractère personnel dans le secteur des communications électroniques – Confidentialité des communications – Fournisseurs de services de communications électroniques – Conservation généralisée et indifférenciée des données relatives au trafic et des données de localisation pendant une période de six mois – Lutte contre la criminalité grave – Accès aux données conservées – Information des personnes concernées – Droit de recours – Directive 2002/58/CE – Article 15, paragraphes 1 et 2 – Directive (UE) 2016/680 – Articles 13 et 54 – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Articles 7, 8, 11 et 47 ainsi que article 52, paragraphe 1.#Affaire C-350/21.

November 17, 2022 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62020CJ0224: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Merck Sharp & Dohme BV and Others v Abacus Medicine A/S and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Free movement of goods – Intellectual property – Trade marks – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – EU trade mark – Article 9(2) – Article 15 – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks – Article 10(2) – Article 15 – Rights conferred by a trade mark – Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark – Parallel import of medicinal products – Repackaging of the product bearing the mark – New outer packaging – Replacement of the trade mark appearing on the original outer packaging by another product name – Reaffixing of the trade mark of the proprietor specific to the product, to the exclusion of the other distinctive marks or signs appearing on that original outer packaging – Opposition by the proprietor of the mark – Artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 47a – Safety features – Replacement – Equivalent features – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 – Article 3(2) – Anti-tampering device.#Case C-224/20.

November 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CJ0578: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#Irish Wind Farmers’ Association Clg and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Article 108(2) and (3) TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 4 – Member State legislation on business property taxation – Methods for valuation of property used to calculate the basis of assessment of the rate payable – Complaint from wind farm operators – Allegation of an under-assessment of the basis of assessment for the business rate payable by fossil fuel electricity producers and, consequently, of a level of business rate of those electricity generators lower than that of other electricity producers due to the choice of valuation method used – Preliminary examination procedure – Decision finding that there is no State aid – No economic and selective advantage – Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Concept of ‘serious difficulties’ – Extent of the European Commission’s investigative duty – Principle of sound administration – Obligation to conduct the investigation procedure diligently and impartially – Scope of review by the General Court of the European Union.#Case C-578/21 P.

November 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CC0628: Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 17 November 2022.###

November 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CC0556: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 17 November 2022.###

November 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CC0338: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 17 November 2022.###

November 17, 2022 No Comments

Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?

Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

Kdaj portal www.zdss.si pošilja obvestila?

Glej Tehnična opis delovanja spletne strani.