admin – Page 4183 – ZDSS

Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62020CJ0357: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 October 2021.#IE v Magistrat der Stadt Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 92/43/EEC – Article 12(1) – System of strict protection for animal species – Annex IV(a) – European hamster (Cricetus cricetus) – Resting places and breeding sites – Deterioration or destruction.#Case C-357/20.

October 28, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0909: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 October 2021.#BX v Unitatea Administrativ Teritorială D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 2003/88/EC – Organisation of working time – Article 2(1) and (2) – Concepts of ‘working time’ and ‘rest period’ – Mandatory vocational training undertaken at the employer’s request.#Case C-909/19.

October 28, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020CJ0221: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2021.#Proceedings brought by A Oy and B Oy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Directive 92/83/EEC – Excise duty – Beer – Article 4(2) – Possibility to apply reduced rates of excise duty to beer brewed by independent small breweries – Treatment as a single independent small brewery or as two or more small breweries – Obligation to transpose.#Joined Cases C-221/20 and C-223/20.

October 28, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0636: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 October 2021.#Y v CAK.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cross-border healthcare – Concept of ‘insured person’ – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 1(c) – Article 2 – Article 24 – Right to the benefits in kind provided by the Member State of residence at the expense of the Member State responsible for paying the pension – Directive 2011/24/EU – Article 3(b)(i) – Article 7 – Reimbursement of the costs of healthcare received in a Member State other than the Member State of residence and the Member State responsible for paying the pension – Conditions.#Case C-636/19.

October 28, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020CJ0324: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 October 2021.#Finanzamt B v X-Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/112/EC – Value added tax (VAT) – Supply of services – Articles 63 – Chargeability of VAT – Articles 64(1) – Concept of ‘supplies which give rise to successive payments’ – One-time supply remunerated by means of payment in instalments – Articles 90(1) – Reduction of the taxable amount – Concept of ‘non-payment of the price’.#Case C-324/20.

October 28, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0319: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 October 2021.#Komisia za protivodeystvie na koruptsiyata i za otnemane na nezakonno pridobitoto imushtestvo v ZV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/42/EU – Scope – National legislation providing for the confiscation of illegally obtained assets in the absence of a criminal conviction.#Case C-319/19.

October 28, 2021 No Comments

Sodba II Ips 325/2007

October 28, 2021 No Comments

Po presoji revizijskega sodišča je tožnik zadostil svojemu trditvenemu bremenu in je tožba sklepčna. Navedba o popolnem propadu vozila namreč po svoji vsebini vključuje tudi delen propad, torej škodo bodisi zaradi popolne bodisi zaradi delne manjvrednosti vozila. Ob tem je dodati še, da je sodišče druge stopnje, ki ob enaki materialnopravni podlagi izpodbijane sodbe ni utemeljilo z enakimi razlogi kot prvostopenjsko sodišče (tj. z neizkazanostjo nedopustnega ravnanja, temveč z neizkazanostjo višine škode), pri tem pa je glede višine škode preseglo zaključke prvostopenjskega sodišča, ki je trditveno podlago tožbe štelo za zadostno in višino tožniku nastale škode ugotovilo do zneska natančno, postopalo v škodo pritožnika, saj ga je postavilo v slabši pravni položaj od tistega, ki mu ga je dajala prvostopenjska sodba.

Sodba II Ips 169/2008

October 28, 2021 No Comments

Višje sodišče ni sledilo pritožbeni graji dejanskega stanja, da je tožnik oseba, ki izkazuje manjše razumevanje stvari. Vrhovno sodišče je v tej fazi postopka vezano na ugotovljeno dejansko stanje in njegovo izpodbijanje ni več dovoljeno (prim. 3. odstavek 370. člena ZPP), zato so vsi tisti revizijski očitki, ki merijo na drugačen dokazni zaključek, neupoštevni.

CELEX:62020CC0498: Conclusions de l’avocat général M. M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona, présentées le 28 octobre 2021.###

October 28, 2021 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62020CC0275: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 28 October 2021.###

October 28, 2021 No Comments

Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?

Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

Kdaj portal www.zdss.si pošilja obvestila?

Glej Tehnična opis delovanja spletne strani.