Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62022CO0031: Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Atlas Copco Airpower and Atlas Copco AB v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Admission of interventions in appeal proceedings against a judgment of the General Court – Annulment of the decision of the General Court – Referral of the case back to the General Court – Decision of the General Court refusing to place on the case file written observations on the judgment effecting that referral lodged by an intervener in the appeal – Implied decision of the General Court refusing to grant an intervener in the appeal the status of intervener before the General Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Status of intervener before the General Court of an intervener in the appeal.#Case C-31/22 P(I).
Več o... »
UPRS Sodba I U 752/2019-48
Ne glede na to, da so izpolnjeni razlogi za izbris po 30. členu ZOdv, pa je treba upoštevati, da gre v primeru izbrisa odvetnika iz imenika odvetnikov za poseg v pravico opravljati poklic. Sodišče sodi, da zaradi ustavne pravice iz tretjega odstavka 49. člena Ustave in zaradi dejstva, da se ta pravica uresničuje znotraj pravosodja (137. člen Ustave), toženka pri presoji razlogov za izbris utemeljeno upošteva 59. č člen statuta OZS. Gre namreč za presojo ukrepa, ki nekomu odvzame pravico opravljati poklic, z vidika načel nujnosti in sorazmernosti, kar je skladno s tretjim odstavkom 15. člena Ustave. Po tej določbi se v postopku izbrisa iz imenika odvetnikov, poleg razlogov za izbris odvetnika iz imenika, upošteva tudi teža kršitev in njene posledice, stopnja odgovornosti, predhodno ravnanje odvetnika, morebitni predhodno uvedeni in ustavljeni postopki izbrisa odvetnika iz imenika, odvetnikova pripravljenost, da se posledice, ki so razlog za izbris po tem statutu, čim…
Več o... »
CELEX:62020CJ0501: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#M P A v LC D N M T.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in the matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Articles 3, 6 to 8 and 14 – Definition of ‘habitual residence’ – Jurisdiction, recognition, enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations – Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 – Articles 3 and 7 – Nationals of two different Member States residing in a third State as members of the contract staff working in the EU Delegation to that third State – Determination of jurisdiction – Forum necessitatis.#Case C-501/20.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0267: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Uniqa Asigurări SA v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor and Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 56 – Supply of insurance services – Point of reference for tax purposes – Claims settlement services provided by third-party companies in the name and on behalf of an insurer.#Case C-267/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62020CJ0184: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#OT v Vyriausioji tarnybinės etikos komisija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 52(1) – Directive 95/46/EC – Article 7(c) – Article 8(1) – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Point (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) and the second subparagraph of Article 6(3) – Article 9(1) – Processing necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject – Objective of public interest – Proportionality – Processing of special categories of personal data – National legislation requiring publication on the internet of data contained in the declarations of private interests of natural persons working in the public service or of heads of associations or establishments receiving public funds – Prevention of conflicts of interest and of corruption in the public sector.#Case C-184/20.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0294: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg and Administration de l’enregistrement et des domaines v Navitours SARL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC – Article 2(1) – Scope – Taxable transactions – Article 9(2)(b) – Place where transport services are supplied – Tourist trips on the Moselle – River subject to condominium status.#Case C-294/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62020CJ0411: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#S v Familienkasse Niedersachsen-Bremen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Freedom of movement of persons – Equal treatment – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 24(1) and (2) – Social security benefits – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 4 – Family benefits – Exclusion of nationals of other Member States who are economically inactive during the first three months of residence in the host Member State.#Case C-411/20.
Več o... »