Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....
CELEX:62020CA0394: Case C-394/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — XY v Finanzamt V (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of capital — Articles 63 and 65 TFEU — National legislation on inheritance tax — Immovable property situated in a Member State — Limited tax liability — Different treatment of residents and non-residents — Right to an allowance on the taxable value — Proportionate reduction in the case of limited tax liability — Liabilities under reserved portions — No deduction in the case of limited tax liability)
February 21, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62021CO0191: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance v Les Anges d’Eux SARL and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 392 – Margin taxation scheme – Scope – Supply of buildings and building land purchased for the purpose of resale – Taxable person for whom the VAT on the purchase of buildings was not deductible – Resale subject to VAT – Concept of ‘building land’.#Case C-191/21.
February 18, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62021CO0191: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 10 février 2022.#Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance contre Les Anges d’Eux SARL e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 392 – Régime de taxation sur la marge – Champ d’application – Livraisons d’immeubles et de terrains à bâtir achetés en vue de la revente – Assujetti n’ayant pas eu le droit à déduction à l’occasion de l’acquisition des immeubles – Revente soumise à la TVA – Notion de “terrains à bâtir”.#Affaire C-191/21.
February 18, 2022
No Comments
This document does not exist in English.
UPRS Sodba I U 609/2019-35
February 18, 2022
No Comments
Iz izpodbijane odločbe ne izhaja, da bi davčni organ ugotavljal okoliščine glede prevzema obravnavanega trošarinskega blaga in sodelovanja morebitnih drugih oseb pri nezakoniti sprostitvi blaga. Tako ni ugotavljal okoliščin njegove potrditve (kdo je potrdil prejem blaga v CMR listini in kdaj) kot tudi ni ugotavljal, kam je bilo blago prepeljano, kdo ga je prevzel ter v zvezi s tem pridobil informacije glede obravnavanega blaga s strani družbe, ki je opravila prevoz (litovska družba E.) oziroma njenega voznika, ki je opravil prevoz navedenega trošarinskega blaga. Od slednje bi lahko pridobil in formacije o tem, kam je bilo blago (namesto v trošarinsko skladišče) dostavljeno in kdo je pri tem sodeloval.
CELEX:62021CO0035: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#„Konservinvest“OOD v „Bulkons Parvomay“ OOD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgarie).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs – Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Designations of Origin and Geographical indications – Article 9 – Transitional national protection – Geographical indication designating an agricultural product, registered under the legislation of a Member State and protected at national level.#Case C-35/21.
February 17, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62021CO0460: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2022.#Vapo Atlantic SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa – CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 1(2) – Levying, for specific purposes, of other indirect taxes – ‘Specific purposes’ – Definition – Financing of a public undertaking holding the concession contract in respect of the national road network – Objectives of environmental sustainability and reducing accidents – Purely budgetary purpose – Refusal to reimburse a tax based on unjust enrichment – Conditions.#Case C-460/21.
February 17, 2022
No Comments
- Blog o davkih – članki(42)
- CFE novice(14)
- Državni zbor RS – zakoni(2351)
- EUR LEX – RSS(16947)
- FURS novice fizične osebe – RSS(9978)
- Izjave ZDSS za javnost(15)
- Izobraževanja in izobraževalni dogodki ZDSS(52)
- Novice DFP(29)
- Novice in stališča ZDSS-ja (izjave za javnost, strokovna stališča)(60)
- Novice RSS FURS podjetja(17169)
- Novice sodbe slovenskih sodišč DAVKI RSS(1011)
- Novice ZDSS – razpisi in druge koristne informacije(12)
- Novice ZDSS (Dogodki, obvestila…) – vsa lastna obvestila ZDSS(128)
- Obvestila ZDSS – delovanje organov ZDSS(18)
- Strokovna mnenja ZDSS(6)
- ZDSS v drugih medijih(4)
Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?
Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko