Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....
CELEX:62019TO0866: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 July 2021.#Ryanair DAC and Laudamotion GmbH v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 – Rules on the distribution of air traffic between Schiphol and Lelystad Airports – Priority for the allocation of slots to Lelystad Airport – Regulatory act entailing implementing measures – Not individually concerned – Inadmissibility.#Case T-866/19.
March 4, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62018TJ0671: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 October 2021.#ZU v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Transfer in the interests of the service – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment – Article 25 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence and the right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of sound administration and duty to have regard for the welfare of staff – Article 22a of the Staff Regulations – Misuse of powers – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – 2017 appraisal exercise – Appraisal report – 2018 promotion exercise – Proposed non-promotion – Liability.#Joined Cases T-671/18 and T-140/19.
March 4, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62021CO0678: Order of the Court of 24 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-678/21 P.
March 4, 2022
No Comments
UPRS Sodba I U 931/2021-8
March 4, 2022
No Comments
Odločanje v ponovljenem postopku ne pomeni, da se postopek začne na novo, temveč, da se nadaljuje tam, kjer je bil pred izdajo prve odločbe tožene stranke. Navedeno za obravnavani primer pomeni, da bi se morala tožena stranka v izpodbijani odločbi opredeliti do tožnikovih ugovorov, da gre le za občasne prejemke ter tudi do predlaganega dokaza po opravi poizvedb pri tožnikovemu delodajalcu. Po presoji sodišča bi morala tožena stranka z opravo poizvedb pri tožnikovemu delodajalcu oziroma na drug ustrezen način ugotoviti dejansko stanje, ki v predmetni zadevi očitno ostaja sporno.
- Blog o davkih – članki(42)
- CFE novice(14)
- Državni zbor RS – zakoni(2355)
- EUR LEX – RSS(17097)
- FURS novice fizične osebe – RSS(10015)
- Izjave ZDSS za javnost(15)
- Izobraževanja in izobraževalni dogodki ZDSS(52)
- Novice DFP(30)
- Novice in stališča ZDSS-ja (izjave za javnost, strokovna stališča)(60)
- Novice RSS FURS podjetja(17189)
- Novice sodbe slovenskih sodišč DAVKI RSS(1011)
- Novice ZDSS – razpisi in druge koristne informacije(12)
- Novice ZDSS (Dogodki, obvestila…) – vsa lastna obvestila ZDSS(129)
- Obvestila ZDSS – delovanje organov ZDSS(18)
- Strokovna mnenja ZDSS(6)
- ZDSS v drugih medijih(4)
Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?
Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko