eur – Page 860 – ZDSS

Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62020CJ0668: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Neunte Kammer) vom 7. April 2022.#GmbH gegen Hauptzollamt.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Gemeinsamer Zolltarif – Kombinierte Nomenklatur – Einreihung von Waren – Positionen 1302, 3301 und 3302 – Extrahiertes Vanille-Oleoresin – Verbrauchsteuern – Richtlinie 92/83/EWG – Steuerbefreiungen – Art. 27 Abs. 1 Buchst. e – Begriff ‚Aroma‘ – Richtlinie 92/12/EWG – Verbrauchsteuerausschuss der Kommission – Kompetenzen.#Rechtssache C-668/20.

April 7, 2022 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62020CJ0447: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 7 avril 2022.#Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) contre LM.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement (CE, Euratom) no 2988/95 – Ressources propres de l’Union européenne – Protection des intérêts financiers de l’Union – Poursuites d’irrégularités – Article 4 – Adoption de mesures administratives – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Délai de prescription des poursuites – Expiration – Invocabilité dans le cadre de la procédure de recouvrement forcé – Article 3, paragraphe 2 – Délai d’exécution – Applicabilité – Point de départ – Interruption et suspension – Marge d’appréciation des États membres.#Affaire C-447/20.

April 7, 2022 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62021CO0762: Order of the Court of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-762/21 P.

April 7, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CO0744: Order of the Court of 31 March 2022.#Henry Cotton’s Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-744/21 P.

April 7, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CO0305: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Article 45a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Certification procedure – 2017 promotion exercise – Exclusion from the final list of officials entitled to take part in the training programme – Notice of competition – Obligation to include a list of annexes with the application form – Non-compliance – Rejection of the application – Principle of sound administration – Proportionality – Regulation No 1 – Rules on languages.#Case C-305/21 P.

April 7, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CO0761: Order of the Court of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-761/21 P.

April 7, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CO0743: Order of the Court of 31 March 2022.#Marina Yachting Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-743/21 P.

April 7, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CO0659: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 30 mars 2022.#Orbest SA contre CS e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Transports aériens – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Règles communes en matière d’indemnisation et d’assistance des passagers en cas d’annulation ou de retard important d’un vol – Article 5, paragraphe 3 – Exonération de l’obligation d’indemnisation – Notion de “circonstances extraordinaires” – Défaillance technique de l’avion, causée par la collision d’un véhicule de restauration appartenant à un tiers contre cet avion en position de stationnement à l’aéroport.#Affaire C-659/21.

April 7, 2022 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

OJ:JOC_2022_153_R_0009: Judgment of the Court of 14 December 2021 in Case E-1/21 ISTM International Shipping & Trucking Management GmbH v Liechtensteinische Alters- und Hinterlassenenversicherung, Liechtensteinische Invalidenversicherung, and Liechtensteinische Familienausgleichskasse (Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Registered office or place of business – Provisional determination – Article 3 EEA – Principle of sincere cooperation) 2022/C 153/09

April 7, 2022 No Comments

OJ:JOC_2022_153_R_0008: Judgment of the Court of 14 December 2021 in Case E-2/21 Norep AS v Haugen Gruppen AS (Self-employed commercial agents – Directive 86/653/EEC – Article 1(2) – Definition of ‘commercial agent’ – Negotiation of the sale or purchase of goods on behalf of the principal) 2022/C 153/08

April 7, 2022 No Comments

Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?

Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

Kdaj portal www.zdss.si pošilja obvestila?

Glej Tehnična opis delovanja spletne strani.