eur – Page 1041 – ZDSS

Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62020TA0436: Case T-436/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Sedus Stoll v EUIPO — Kappes (Sedus ergo+) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ — Earlier national and international word marks ERGOPLUS — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0429: Case T-429/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Sedus Stoll v EUIPO — Kappes (Sedus ergo+) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Sedus ergo+ — Earlier national word mark ERGOPLUS — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0219: Case T-219/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — JK v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Commission staff working for the EEAS — Request for assistance — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Implied decision rejecting the request — Decision rejecting the complaint — Article 90 of the Staff Regulations — Competent Appointing Authority — Principle of sound administration)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0121: Case T-121/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — IP v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — OLAF investigation — Reimbursement of medical expenses — Disciplinary penalty — Termination of contract without notice — Article 10(h) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Reoffending — Article 27 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Decision granting a request that no mention of a previous penalty remain in the personal file — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations — Sanction cannot be enforced or invoked against the official if no mention of it remains in the personal file)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0124: Case T-124/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — M/S. Indeutsch International v EUIPO — 135 Kirkstall (Representation of chevrons between two parallel lines) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark representing chevrons between two parallel lines — Absolute ground for refusal — Sign of which an EU trade mark may consist — Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Obligation to rule on the action — Article 71(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Cross-claim)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0088: Case T-88/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Rivière and Others v Parliament (Institutional law — European Parliament — Measure adopted by the President of the European Parliament forbidding national flags being placed on the desks of Members of Parliament — Standards of conduct of Members of Parliament — Article 10(3) of the Parliament’s Rules of Procedure — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0022: Case T-22/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — IB v EUIPO (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Suspension of the invalidity procedure during the disciplinary proceedings — Removal from post — Invalidity procedure which has become devoid of purpose following removal from post — Action for annulment — Act adversely affecting an official — Admissibility — Principle of sound administration — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Manifest error of assessment)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0043: Case T-43/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — AV and AW v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary measure — Downgrading — Rights of the defence — Principle of good administration — Manifest error of assessment)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0012: Case T-12/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 –Schneider v EUIPO — Frutaria Comercial de Frutas y Hortalizas (Frutaria) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative trade mark Frutaria — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use — Nature of use)

December 6, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TA0001: Case T-1/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — M.I. Industries v EUIPO — Natural Instinct (INSTINCT) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark INSTINCT — No genuine use of the trade mark — Extent of use — Overall assessment of the evidence — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

December 6, 2021 No Comments

Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?

Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

Kdaj portal www.zdss.si pošilja obvestila?

Glej Tehnična opis delovanja spletne strani.