Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62021CJ0203: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#Criminal proceedings against DELTA STROY 2003.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA – Applicability – Imposition of a financial penalty on a legal person for non-payment of tax debts – Concept of ‘confiscation’ – Articles 48, 49 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Penalties of a criminal nature – Principles of the presumption of innocence and the legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties – Rights of the defence – Imposition of a criminal penalty on a legal person for an offence committed by the representative of that legal person – Parallel criminal proceedings against that representative that have not been concluded – Proportionality.#Case C-203/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0486: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#SHARENGO najem in zakup vozil d.o.o. v Mestna občina Ljubljana.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public system for the rental and shared use of electric cars – Distinction between the concepts of ‘services concessions’ and ‘public supply contracts’ – Directive 2014/23/EU – Article 5(1)(b) – Article 20(4) – Concept of ‘mixed contracts’ – Article 8 – Determining the value of a services concession – Criteria – Article 27 – Article 38 – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 2(1), points 5 and 8 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1986 – Annex XXI – Possibility of imposing a condition concerning the registration of a specific professional activity under national law – Impossibility of imposing that condition on all members of a temporary business association – Regulation (EC) No 2195/2002 – Article 1(1) – Obligation to refer exclusively to the ‘Common Procurement Vocabulary’ in concession documents – Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 – Article 1(2) – Impossibility of referring to the ‘NACE Rev. 2’ nomenclature in the concession documents.#Case C-486/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62019CJ0873: Sodba Sodišča (veliki senat) z dne 8. novembra 2022.#Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV proti Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht.#Predhodno odločanje – Okolje – Aarhuška konvencija – Dostop do pravnega varstva – Člen 9(3) – Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah – Člen 47, prvi odstavek – Pravica do učinkovitega sodnega varstva – Združenje za varovanje okolja – Procesno upravičenje takega združenja pri nacionalnem sodišču za izpodbijanje ES-homologacije, podeljene nekaterim vozilom – Uredba (ES) št. 715/2007 – Člen 5(2)(a) – Motorna vozila – Dizelski motor – Izpusti onesnaževal – Ventil za vračanje izpušnih plinov v valj (ventil EGR) – Zmanjšanje emisij dušikovih oksidov (NOx), omejeno s ,temperaturnim oknom‘ – Odklopna naprava – Odobritev take naprave, če je potreba po njej upravičena zaradi zaščite motorja pred okvarami ali poškodbami in varnega delovanja vozila – Stanje tehnike.#Zadeva C-873/19.
Več o... »
CELEX:62019CJ0873: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Access to justice – Article 9(3) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47, first paragraph – Right to effective judicial protection – Environmental association – Standing of such an association to bring an action before a national court against EC type-approval granted to certain vehicles – Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 – Article 5(2)(a) – Motor vehicles – Diesel engine – Pollutant emissions – Valve for exhaust gas recirculation (EGR valve) – Reduction of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ – Defeat device – Authorisation of such a device where the need is justified in terms of protecting the engine against damage or accident and for safe operation of the vehicle – State of the art.#Case C-873/19.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0163: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#AD v PACCAR Inc and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Compensation for harm caused by a practice prohibited under Article 101(1) TFEU – Collusive arrangements on pricing and gross price increases for trucks in the European Economic Area (EEA) – Directive 2014/104/EU – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Article 22(2) – Applicability ratione temporis – First subparagraph of Article 5(1) – Concept of relevant evidence which lies in the control of the defendant or a third party – Article 5(2) – Disclosure of specified items of evidence or relevant categories of evidence on the basis of reasonably available facts – Article 5(3) – Review of the proportionality of the request to disclose evidence – Balancing the legitimate interests of the parties and third parties – Scope of the obligations resulting from those provisions.#Case C-163/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0278: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#Dansk Akvakultur agissant pour AquaPri A/S v Miljø- og Fødevareklagenævnet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Article 6(3) – Assessment of a project likely to affect a protected site – Obligation to conduct an assessment – Continuation of the economic activity of an operation already authorised at the planning stage, under unchanged conditions, where authorisation has been granted following an incomplete assessment.#Case C-278/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0385: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#Zenith Media Communications SRL v Consiliul Concurenţei.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Penalty imposed by the national competition authority – Determination of the amount of the fine – Consideration of turnover in the profit and loss account – Request for the national competition authority to take into account a different turnover – Refusal by the Competition Council – Real situation of the undertaking concerned – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-385/21.
Več o... »