EUR LEX – RSS – Page 1833 – ZDSS

Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62021CO0030: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 September 2021.#Nemzeti Útdíjfizetési Szolgáltató Zrt., Nationale Mauterhebung geschlossene Dienstleistungs AG v NW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Lennestadt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 1(1) – Substantive scope – Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ – Proceedings seeking to recover a charge relating to the use of a toll road.#Case C-30/21.

September 29, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62018TJ0342: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 September 2021 (Extracts).#Nichicon Corporation v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Price coordination throughout the EEA – Concerted practice – Exchanges of sensitive business information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Restriction of competition by object – Statement of objections – Point 13 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Value of sales – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Single and continuous infringement – Gravity of the infringement – Public distancing – Mitigating circumstances – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-342/18.

September 29, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62018TJ0341: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 September 2021 (Extracts).#Nec Corp. v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Price coordination throughout the EEA – Attribution to the parent company of the infringement committed by its subsidiary – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Gravity of the infringement – Increase in the amount of the fine for repeated infringement – Proportionality – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-341/18.

September 29, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62018TJ0343: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 September 2021 (Extracts).#Tokin Corp. v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Price coordination throughout the EEA – Statement of objections – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Value of sales – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Gravity of the infringement – Mitigating circumstances.#Case T-343/18.

September 29, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62018TJ0363: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 September 2021 (Extracts).#Nippon Chemi-Con Corporation v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Price coordination throughout the EEA – Concerted practice – Exchanges of sensitive business information – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Rights of the defence and right to be heard – Inalterability of the measure – Single and continuous infringement – Restriction of competition by object – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Value of sales – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Gravity of the infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Point 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-363/18.

September 29, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62019TJ0569: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#AlzChem Group AG v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to a procedure for the recovery of State aid following a decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest – Principle of non-discrimination – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-569/19.

September 29, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62018TJ0344: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 September 2021 (Extracts).#Rubycon Corp. and Rubycon Holdings Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Price coordination throughout the EEA – Fines – Partial immunity from fines – Point 26 of the 2006 Leniency Notice – Reduction in the amount of the fine – Point 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Ceiling of 10% of turnover – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-344/18.

September 29, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62020TJ0116: This document does not exist in English. Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 29 septembre 2021.#Società agricola Vivai Maiorana Ss e.a. contre Commission européenne.#Agriculture – Règlement (UE) 2016/2031 – Mesures de protection contre les organismes nuisibles aux végétaux – Liste des organismes réglementés non de quarantaine de l’Union – Seuil à partir duquel la présence d’un organisme réglementé non de quarantaine de l’Union sur les végétaux destinés à la plantation a une incidence économique inacceptable – Règlement d’exécution (UE) 2019/2072 – Associations professionnelles – Recours en annulation – Qualité pour agir – Recevabilité – Proportionnalité – Obligation de motivation.#Affaire T-116/20.

September 29, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62019TJ0344: This document does not exist in English. Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre élargie) du 29 septembre 2021.#Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario) contre Conseil de l’Union européenne.#Relations extérieures – Accords internationaux – Accord euro‑méditerranéen d’association CE‑Maroc – Accord de partenariat dans le domaine de la pêche durable entre l’Union et le Maroc – Protocole de mise en œuvre de l’accord de partenariat – Échange de lettres accompagnant l’accord de partenariat – Décision de conclusion – Règlement relatif à la répartition des possibilités de pêche entre les États membres – Recours en annulation – Recevabilité – Capacité d’ester en justice – Affectation directe – Affectation individuelle – Champ d’application territorial – Compétence – Interprétation du droit international retenue par la Cour – Principe d’autodétermination – Principe de l’effet relatif des traités – Invocabilité – Notion de consentement – Mise en œuvre – Pouvoir d’appréciation – Limites – Maintien des effets de la décision attaquée.#Affaire T-344/19.

September 29, 2021 No Comments

CELEX:62019TJ0279: This document does not exist in English. Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre élargie) du 29 septembre 2021.#Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario) contre Conseil de l’Union européenne.#Relations extérieures – Accords internationaux – Accord euro-méditerranéen d’association CE-Maroc – Accord sous forme d’échange de lettres sur la modification des protocoles no 1 et no 4 de l’accord euro-méditerranéen – Décision approuvant la conclusion de l’accord – Recours en annulation – Recevabilité – Capacité d’ester en justice – Affectation directe – Affectation individuelle – Champ d’application territorial – Compétence – Interprétation du droit international retenue par la Cour – Principe d’autodétermination – Principe de l’effet relatif des traités – Invocabilité – Notion de consentement – Mise en œuvre – Pouvoir d’appréciation – Limites – Maintien des effets de la décision attaquée.#Affaire T-279/19.

September 29, 2021 No Comments

Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?

Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

Kdaj portal www.zdss.si pošilja obvestila?

Glej Tehnična opis delovanja spletne strani.