Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....
CELEX:62020CO0670: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 December 2021.#EP and Others v ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency – Terms exposing the borrower to a foreign exchange risk – Article 4(2) – Requirements of intelligibility and transparency – Lack of effect of the declaration by the consumer under which he or she is fully aware of the potential risks arising from a loan denominated in a foreign currency – Contractual term that is in plain, intelligible language.#Case C-670/20.
December 17, 2021
No Comments
CELEX:62021CO0476: Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 10 décembre 2021.#Rezon OOD contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-476/21 P.
December 17, 2021
No Comments
This document does not exist in English.
CELEX:62020CO0670: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 6 décembre 2021.#EP e.a. contre ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Contrat de prêt libellé en devise étrangère – Clauses exposant l’emprunteur à un risque de change – Article 4, paragraphe 2 – Exigences d’intelligibilité et de transparence – Absence d’incidence de la déclaration du consommateur selon laquelle celui-ci est pleinement conscient des risques potentiels découlant de la souscription d’un prêt libellé en devise étrangère – Rédaction claire et compréhensible d’une clause contractuelle.#Affaire C-670/20.
December 17, 2021
No Comments
This document does not exist in English.
CELEX:62019CC0898: Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 16 December 2021.###
December 17, 2021
No Comments
CELEX:62020CJ0203: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2021.#Criminal proceedings against AB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Scope – Article 51 – Implementation of EU law – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Jurisdiction of the Court – Reference made before the issue of a European arrest warrant – Admissibility – Principle ne bis in idem – Article 50 – Concepts of ‘acquittal’ and ‘conviction’ – Amnesty in the issuing Member State – Final decision discontinuing a criminal prosecution – Revocation of the amnesty – Setting-aside of the decision discontinuing the criminal prosecution – Resumption of proceedings – Need for a decision taken after a determination of the criminal liability of the person concerned – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Scope – Concept of ‘criminal proceedings’ – Legislative procedure for the adoption of a resolution relating to the revocation of an amnesty – Judicial procedure for review of the compliance of that resolution with the national Constitution.#Case C-203/20.
December 17, 2021
No Comments
CELEX:62020CJ0225: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Sechste Kammer) vom 16. Dezember 2021.#Euro Delta Danube Srl gegen Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură – Centrul Judeţean Tulcea.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Landwirtschaft – Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik – Delegierte Verordnung (EU) Nr. 640/2014 – Flächenbezogene Beihilferegelung – Einheitliche Flächenzahlung – Förderkriterien – Konzessionsvertrag für landwirtschaftliche Flächen – Änderung der Nutzung der Flächen ohne Zustimmung des Konzessionsgebers – Nutzung von zur Fischzucht bestimmter Flächen zu landwirtschaftlichen Zwecken – Differenz zwischen der angemeldeten Fläche und der ermittelten Fläche – Übererklärung – Verwaltungssanktionen.#Rechtssache C-225/20.
December 17, 2021
No Comments
This document does not exist in English.
- Blog o davkih – članki(42)
- CFE novice(14)
- Državni zbor RS – zakoni(3308)
- EUR LEX – RSS(18750)
- FURS novice fizične osebe – RSS(11397)
- Izjave ZDSS za javnost(15)
- Izobraževanja in izobraževalni dogodki ZDSS(55)
- Novice DFP(32)
- Novice in stališča ZDSS-ja (izjave za javnost, strokovna stališča)(60)
- Novice RSS FURS podjetja(19933)
- Novice sodbe slovenskih sodišč DAVKI RSS(1049)
- Novice ZDSS – razpisi in druge koristne informacije(12)
- Novice ZDSS (Dogodki, obvestila…) – vsa lastna obvestila ZDSS(134)
- Obvestila ZDSS – delovanje organov ZDSS(18)
- Strokovna mnenja ZDSS(6)
- ZDSS v drugih medijih(4)
Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?
Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko