Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62021CJ0183: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#Maxxus Group GmbH & Co. KG v Globus Holding GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 19 – Genuine use of a trade mark – Burden of proof – Application to revoke for non-use – National procedural rule obliging the applicant to carry out market research concerning use of the mark.#Case C-183/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62020CJ0177: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#ˮGrossmaniaˮ Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Győri Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – Primacy – Direct effect – Sincere cooperation – Article 4(3) TEU – Article 63 TFEU – Obligations on a Member State as a result of a preliminary ruling – Interpretation of a provision of EU law given by the Court in a preliminary ruling – Obligation to give full effect to EU law – Obligation for a national court to disapply national legislation which contravenes EU law as interpreted by the Court – Administrative decision which became final in the absence of a challenge before the courts – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Liability of the Member State.#Case C-177/20.
Več o... »
CELEX:62020CJ0177: Sodba Sodišča (tretji senat) z dne 10. marca 2022.#„Grossmania“ Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft proti Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Győri Törvényszék.#Predhodno odločanje – Načela prava Unije – Primarnost – Neposredni učinek – Lojalno sodelovanje – Člen 4(3) PEU – Člen 63 PDEU – Obveznosti države članice, ki izhajajo iz sodbe, izdane v postopku predhodnega odločanja – Razlaga pravila prava Unije, ki jo je Sodišče podalo v sodbi, izdani v postopku predhodnega odločanja – Obveznost zagotovitve polnega učinka prava Unije – Obveznost nacionalnega sodišča, da ne uporabi nacionalne ureditve, ki je v nasprotju s pravom Unije, kot ga je razložilo Sodišče – Upravna odločba, ki je postala pravnomočna, ker ni bilo vloženo pravno sredstvo pri sodišču – Načeli enakovrednosti in učinkovitosti – Odgovornost države članice.#Zadeva C-177/20.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CO0649: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 22 February 2022.#Fastweb SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Competition – Concentrations – Decision declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the Agreement on the European Economic Area, subject to compliance with certain commitments – Undertaking operating on the markets concerned by the concentration – Interest in the result of the case – Admission to intervene.#Case C-649/21 P(I).
Več o... »
CELEX:62020CJ0177: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#ˮGrossmaniaˮ Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – Primacy – Direct effect – Sincere cooperation – Article 4(3) TEU – Article 63 TFEU – Obligations on a Member State as a result of a preliminary ruling – Interpretation of a provision of EU law given by the Court in a preliminary ruling – Obligation to give full effect to EU law – Obligation for a national court to disapply national legislation which contravenes EU law as interpreted by the Court – Administrative decision which became final in the absence of a challenge before the courts – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness – Liability of the Member State.#Case C-177/20.
Več o... »
CELEX:62020CJ0498:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Achte Kammer) vom 10. März 2022.#ZK en qualité de successeur de JM, curateur à la faillite de BMA Nederland BV gegen BMA Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt AG.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Zivilsachen – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1215/2012 – Art. 7 Nr. 2 – Gerichtliche Zuständigkeit für Klagen, bei denen eine unerlaubte Handlung oder eine Handlung, die einer unerlaubten Handlung gleichgestellt ist, oder Ansprüche aus einer solchen Handlung den Gegenstand des Verfahrens bilden – Klage eines Insolvenzverwalters gegen einen Dritten im Interesse der Gläubiger – Ort des Eintritts des schädigenden Ereignisses – Art. 8 Nr. 2 – Interventionsklage eines Vertreters kollektiver Interessen – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 864/2007 – Anwendungsbereich – Allgemeine Kollisionsnorm.#Rechtssache C-498/20.
This document does not exist in English.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0183: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#Maxxus Group GmbH & Co. KG v Globus Holding GmbH & Co. KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 19 – Genuine use of a trade mark – Burden of proof – Application to revoke for non-use – National procedural rule obliging the applicant to carry out market research concerning use of the mark.#Case C-183/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0060:           Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 10 mars 2022.#Commission européenne contre Royaume de Belgique.#Manquement d’État – Article 45 TFUE – Article 28 de l’accord sur l’Espace économique européen – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Fiscalité directe – Impôt sur le revenu – Déductions – Rentes alimentaires – Égalité de traitement – Discrimination entre contribuables résidents et non-résidents.#Affaire C-60/21.
This document does not exist in English.
Več o... »