CELEX:62020CA0562: Case C-562/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — SIA ‘Rodl & Partner’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing — Directive (EU) 2015/849 — Article 18(1) and (3) — Point 3(b) of Annex III — Risk-based approach — Risk assessment carried out by obliged entities — Identification of risks by Member States and obliged entities — Customer due diligence measures — Enhanced due diligence measures — High-corruption-risk third countries — Article 13(1)(c) and (d) — Evidence and documentation requirements for obliged entities — Article 14(5) — Ongoing monitoring of customers by obliged entities — Publication of decisions imposing a sanction) EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 January, 2023
CELEX:62020CA0331: Joined Cases C-331/20 P and C-343/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 November 2022 — Volotea SA (C-331/20 P), easyJet Airline Co. Ltd (C-343/20 P) v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Article 107(1) TFEU — European Commission decision on compensation to Sardinian airports for public service obligations — Existence of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market, granted by the Italian Republic to airlines through airport operators — Concept of ‘State aid’ — Proof of the existence of an advantage — Determination of the amount — Market economy operator principle — Applicability and application — Test of the private acquirer of goods or services — Conditions — Burden of proof) EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 January, 2023
CELEX:62020CA0224: Case C-224/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sø- og Handelsretten — Denmark) — Merck Sharp & Dohme BV, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., MSD Danmark ApS v Abacus Medicine A/S, and Novartis AG v Abacus Medicine A/S, and Novartis AG v Abacus Medicine A/S, and Novartis AG v Paranova Danmark A/S, and H. Lundbeck A/S v Paranova Danmark A/S, and MSD Danmark ApS, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v 2CARE4 ApS, and Ferring Lægemidler A/S v Paranova Danmark A/S (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 34 and 36 TFEU — Free movement of goods — Intellectual property — Trade marks — Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — EU trade mark — Article 9(2) — Article 15 — Directive (EU) 2015/2436 — Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks — Article 10(2) — Article 15 — Rights conferred by a trade mark — Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark — Parallel import of medicinal products — Repackaging of the product bearing the mark — New outer packaging — Replacement of the trade mark appearing on the original outer packaging by another product name — Reaffixing of the trade mark of the proprietor specific to the product, to the exclusion of the other distinctive marks or signs appearing on that original outer packaging — Opposition by the proprietor of the mark — Artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Article 47a — Safety features — Replacement — Equivalent features — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 — Article 3(2) — Anti-tampering device) EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 January, 2023
CELEX:62020CA0253: Joined Cases C-253/20 and C-254/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel — Belgium) — Impexeco NV v Novartis AG (C-253/20), PI Pharma NV v Novartis AG, Novartis Pharma NV (C-254/20) (References for a preliminary ruling — Articles 34 and 36 TFEU — Free movement of goods — Intellectual property — Trade marks — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 9(2) — Article 13 — Directive 2008/95 — Article 5(1) — Article 7 — Rights conferred by a trade mark — Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark — Parallel imports of medicinal products — Reference medicinal product and generic medicinal product — Economically linked undertakings — Repackaging of the generic medicinal product — New outer packaging — Affixing the trade mark of the reference medicinal product — Opposition by the proprietor of the trade mark — Artificial partitioning of the markets between the Member States) EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 January, 2023
CELEX:62020CA0147: Case C-147/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Novartis Pharma GmbH v Abacus Medicine A/S (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — EU trade mark — Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 9(2) — Rights conferred by a mark — Article 15 — Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark — Parallel import of medicinal products — Repackaging of the product bearing the mark — New outer packaging — Opposition by the proprietor of the mark — Artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Article 47a — Safety features — Replacement — Equivalent features — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 — Article 3(2) — Anti-tampering device — Unique identifier) EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 January, 2023
CELEX:62020CA0204: Case C-204/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH v kohlpharma GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Trade marks — Directive (EU) 2015/2436 — Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks — Article 10(2) — Rights conferred by a trade mark — Article 15 — Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark — Parallel import of medicinal products — Repackaging of the product bearing the mark — New outer packaging — Opposition by the proprietor of the mark — Artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Article 47a — Safety features — Replacement — Equivalent features — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/161 — Article 3(2) — Anti-tampering device — Unique identifier) EUR LEX - RSSBy admin16 January, 2023
CELEX:62021CJ0280: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#P.I. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Eligibility for refugee status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 10(1)(e) and (2) – Reasons for persecution – Concepts of ‘political opinion’ and ‘attributed political opinion’ – Attempts by an applicant for asylum to defend himself, in his country of origin, by legal means against non-State actors acting illegally and in a position to exploit the mechanism by which that State imposes penalties for criminal offences.#Case C-280/21. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin12 January, 2023
CELEX:62021CJ0395: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#D.V. v M.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Contract for the provision of legal services concluded between a lawyer and a consumer – Article 4(2) – Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms – Exclusion of terms relating to the main subject matter of the contract – Term providing for the payment of lawyers’ fees on the basis of an hourly rate – Article 6(1) – Powers of the national court when dealing with a term considered to be ‘unfair’.#Case C-395/21. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin12 January, 2023
CELEX:62021CJ0356: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#J.K. v TP S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Article 3(1)(a) and (c) – Conditions for access to self-employment – Employment and working conditions – Prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation – Self-employed person working on the basis of a contract for specific work – Termination and non-renewal of contract – Freedom to choose a contracting party.#Case C-356/21. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin12 January, 2023
CELEX:62021CJ0057: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zweite Kammer) vom 12. Januar 2023.#RegioJet a. s. gegen České dráhy a.s. und Česká republika, Ministerstvo dopravy.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Wettbewerb – Missbrauch einer beherrschenden Stellung – Vorschriften für Schadensersatzklagen nach nationalem Recht wegen Zuwiderhandlungen gegen wettbewerbsrechtliche Bestimmungen der Mitgliedstaaten und der Europäischen Union – Richtlinie 2014/104/EU – Art. 5 und 6 – Offenlegung von Beweismitteln – Beweismittel in den Akten einer Wettbewerbsbehörde – Bei der Europäischen Kommission anhängiges Verfahren wegen einer Zuwiderhandlung gegen die Wettbewerbsregeln – Nationales Verfahren über eine Schadensersatzklage wegen derselben Zuwiderhandlung – Bedingungen für die Offenlegung von Beweismitteln.#Rechtssache C-57/21. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin12 January, 2023This document does not exist in English.