CELEX:62019TJ0158:           Urteil des Gerichts (Zehnte Kammer) vom 15. Dezember 2021.#Patrick Breyer gegen Europäische Exekutivagentur für die Forschung.#Zugang zu Dokumenten – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1049/2001 – Rahmenprogramm für Forschung und Innovation ‚Horizont 2020‘ (2014-2020) – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1290/2013 – Dokumente zum Forschungsprojekt ‚iBorderCtrl: Intelligent Portable Border Control System‘ – Ausnahme zum Schutz der geschäftlichen Interessen eines Dritten – Teilweise Verweigerung des Zugangs – Überwiegendes öffentliches Interesse.#Rechtssache T-158/19.

EUR LEX - RSS
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62019TJ0565: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 December 2021.#Oltchim SA v European Commission.#State aid – Measures taken by Romania to support a petrochemical company – Non-enforcement, accumulation and cancellation of public claims – Action for annulment – Period within which proceedings must be brought – Point from which time starts to run – Article 24(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Interest in bringing proceedings – Existence of one or more measures – State resources – Imputability to the State – Applicability of the private creditor test – Application of the private creditor test – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-565/19.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CO0474: Order of the Court of 8 December 2021.#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-474/21 P.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CO0473: Order of the Court of 8 December 2021.#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-473/21 P.

EUR LEX - RSS