CELEX:62020CJ0568:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Dritte Kammer) vom 7. April 2022.#J gegen H Limited.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Zivilsachen – Gerichtliche Zuständigkeit und Anerkennung und Vollstreckung von Entscheidungen in Zivil- und Handelssachen – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1215/2012 – Anwendungsbereich – Art. 2 Buchst. a – Begriff ‚Entscheidung‘ – In einem anderen Mitgliedstaat nach summarischer kontradiktorischer Prüfung einer in einem Drittstaat ergangenen Entscheidung erlassene Zahlungsanordnung – Art. 39 – Vollstreckbarkeit in den Mitgliedstaaten.#Rechtssache C-568/20.

EUR LEX - RSS
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62020CJ0342:           Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 7 avril 2022.#A SCPI contre Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Articles 63 et 65 TFUE – Libre circulation des capitaux – Restrictions – Impôt sur le revenu des personnes morales – Exonération des fonds d’investissement – Conditions d’exonération – Condition relative à la forme contractuelle du fonds.#Affaire C-342/20.

EUR LEX - RSS
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62020CJ0385:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 7 avril 2022.#EL et TP contre Caixabank SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Principe d’effectivité – Principe d’équivalence – Procédure juridictionnelle visant à la constatation du caractère abusif d’une clause contractuelle – Pouvoir de contrôle d’office de la juridiction nationale – Procédure nationale de taxation des dépens – Dépens remboursables au titre d’honoraires d’avocat.#Affaire C-385/20.

EUR LEX - RSS
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62020CJ0668:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Neunte Kammer) vom 7. April 2022.#GmbH gegen Hauptzollamt.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Gemeinsamer Zolltarif – Kombinierte Nomenklatur – Einreihung von Waren – Positionen 1302, 3301 und 3302 – Extrahiertes Vanille-Oleoresin – Verbrauchsteuern – Richtlinie 92/83/EWG – Steuerbefreiungen – Art. 27 Abs. 1 Buchst. e – Begriff ‚Aroma‘ – Richtlinie 92/12/EWG – Verbrauchsteuerausschuss der Kommission – Kompetenzen.#Rechtssache C-668/20.

EUR LEX - RSS
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62020CJ0447:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 7 avril 2022.#Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) contre LM.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement (CE, Euratom) no 2988/95 – Ressources propres de l’Union européenne – Protection des intérêts financiers de l’Union – Poursuites d’irrégularités – Article 4 – Adoption de mesures administratives – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Délai de prescription des poursuites – Expiration – Invocabilité dans le cadre de la procédure de recouvrement forcé – Article 3, paragraphe 2 – Délai d’exécution – Applicabilité – Point de départ – Interruption et suspension – Marge d’appréciation des États membres.#Affaire C-447/20.

EUR LEX - RSS
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62021CO0762: Order of the Court of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-762/21 P.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CO0744: Order of the Court of 31 March 2022.#Henry Cotton’s Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-744/21 P.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CO0305: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Article 45a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Certification procedure – 2017 promotion exercise – Exclusion from the final list of officials entitled to take part in the training programme – Notice of competition – Obligation to include a list of annexes with the application form – Non-compliance – Rejection of the application – Principle of sound administration – Proportionality – Regulation No 1 – Rules on languages.#Case C-305/21 P.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CO0761: Order of the Court of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-761/21 P.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CO0743: Order of the Court of 31 March 2022.#Marina Yachting Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-743/21 P.

EUR LEX - RSS