Tag Archives: davki

CELEX:62021CA0072: Case C-72/21: Judgment of the Court (Eight Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — SIA ‘PRODEX’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff headings — Subheading 4418 20 — Scope — Doors and their frames and thresholds — MDF panels and mouldings — First sentence of general rule 2(a) for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature — Incomplete or unfinished article — Concept)

CELEX:62021CA0044: Case C-44/21: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I — Germany) — Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG v HARTING Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Harting Electric GmbH & Co. KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 9(1) — European patent — Interim measures — Power of national judicial authorities to issue an interlocutory injunction to prevent an imminent infringement of an intellectual property right — National case-law dismissing applications for interim measures where the validity of the patent in question has not been confirmed, at the very least, by a decision given at first instance in opposition or invalidity proceedings — Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law)

CELEX:62020CA0674: Case C-674/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle — Belgium) — Airbnb Ireland UC v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Internal market — Article 114(2) TFEU — Exclusion of fiscal provisions — Directive 2000/31/EC — Information society services — Electronic commerce — Online property rental platform — Article 1(5)(a) — Exclusion of the field of taxation — Definition — Regional legislation concerning a tax on tourist accommodation establishments — Provision requiring intermediaries to provide, on a written request, certain particulars concerning the operation of those establishments to the tax authority with the aim of identifying persons liable for that tax — Article 56 TFEU — No discrimination — No restriction)

CELEX:62020CA0642: Case C-642/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia amministrativa per la Regione siciliana — Italy) — Caruter s.r.l. v S.R.R. Messina Provincia S.c.P.A. and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2014/24/EU — Public procurement — Article 63 — Reliance by a group of economic operators on the capacities of other entities — Possibility for the contracting authority to require that certain critical tasks be performed by a participant of that group — National legislation stipulating that the undertaking representing that group must satisfy the majority of the criteria and perform the majority of the services)

CELEX:62020CA0637: Case C-637/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Skatteverket v DSAB Destination Stockholm AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2006/112/EC — Common system of value added tax — Article 30a(1) — Concept of ‘voucher’ — Article 30a(3) — Concept of ‘“multi-purpose” voucher’ — Sale of a card entitling the cardholder to a number of tourist services for a limited period)

CELEX:62020CA0612: Case C-612/20: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj — Romania) — Happy Education SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Cluj (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(i) — Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest — Exemptions related to children’s or young people’s education, school or university education — Supply of educational services supplementing the school curriculum — Private law body providing those services for commercial purposes)

CELEX:62020CA0559: Case C-559/20: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken — Germany) — Koch Media GmbH v FU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 14 — Concepts of ‘legal costs’ and ‘other expenses’ — Warning notice in order to ensure enforcement of intellectual property rights out of court — Lawyers’ fees — Classification — National provision limiting the amount of those costs recoverable under certain conditions)

CELEX:62020CA0531: Case C-531/20: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — NovaText GmbH v Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 3 — General obligation concerning the measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights — Article 14 — Concept of ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs’ — Consultation of a patent lawyer — Absence of opportunity for the national court to assess the reasonableness and proportionality of the costs to be borne by the unsuccessful party)

CELEX:62020CA0510: Case C-510/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 258 TFEU — Environment — Directive 2008/56/EC — Marine environmental policy — Article 5 — Marine strategies — Article 17(2) and (3) — Failure to review, within the time limits, the initial assessment, the determination of good environmental status and the environmental targets — Failure to send to the European Commission, within the time limts, details of any updates made following the reviews)

CELEX:62020CA0415: Joined Cases C-415/20, C-419/20 and C-427/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Gräfendorfer Geflügel- und Tiefkühlfeinkost Produktions GmbH (C-415/20), F. Reyher Nchfg. GmbH & Co. KG vertr. d. d. Komplementärin Verwaltungsgesellschaft F. Reyher Nchfg. mbH (C-419/20), Flexi Montagetechnik GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg (C-415/20 and C-419/20), Hauptzollamt Kiel (C-427/20) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Rights to the repayment or to the payment of sums of money levied or refused by a Member State in breach of EU law — Anti-dumping duties, import duties, export refunds and financial penalties — Concept of ‘breach of EU law’ — Misinterpretation or misapplication of EU law — Finding of a breach of EU law by a Court of the European Union or by a national court — Right to the payment of interest — Period covered by that payment of interest)