CELEX:62022CO0229: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 December 2022.#NC v Compania Naţională de Transporturi Aeriene Tarom SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1)(c)(iii) – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Cancellation of a flight – Right to compensation in the case of an offer of re-routing – Conditions – Divergence between different language versions of a provision of EU law – Re-routing allowing passengers to depart no more than one hour before their scheduled time of departure.#Case C-229/22.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CJ0596: Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 24. novembra 2022.#A proti Finanzamt M.#Predhodno odločanje – Obdavčenje – Davek na dodano vrednost (DDV) – Direktiva 2006/112/ES – Člena 167 in 168 – Pravica do odbitka vstopnega DDV – Načelo prepovedi goljufije – Dobavna veriga – Zavrnitev pravice do odbitka v primeru goljufije – Davčni zavezanec – Drugi pridobitelj blaga – Goljufija, ki se nanaša na del DDV, dolgovanega pri prvi pridobitvi – Obseg zavrnitve pravice do odbitka.#Zadeva C-596/21.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62022CO0229:           Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 2 décembre 2022.#NC contre Compania Naţională de Transporturi Aeriene Tarom SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Transports aériens – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Article 5, paragraphe 1, sous c), iii) – Indemnisation et assistance des passagers – Annulation d’un vol – Droit à indemnisation en cas d’offre de réacheminement – Conditions – Divergence entre les différentes versions linguistiques d’une disposition du droit de l’Union – Réacheminement permettant aux passagers de partir au plus tôt une heure avant l’heure de départ prévue.#Affaire C-229/22.

EUR LEX - RSS
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62021CA0295: Zadeva C-295/21: Sodba Sodišča (osmi senat) z dne 20. oktobra 2022 (predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Cour d’appel de Bruxelles – Belgija) – Allianz Benelux SA/État belge, SPF Finances (Predhodno odločanje – Skupni sistem obdavčitve matičnih družb in odvisnih družb iz različnih držav članic – Direktiva 90/435/EGS – Člen 4(1) – Oprostitev dividend, ki jih izplača odvisna družba, na ravni matične družbe – Prenos presežkov dokončno obdavčenih dohodkov v naslednja davčna obdobja – Pripojitev družbe, ki ima presežke dokončno obdavčenih dohodkov, s strani druge družbe – Nacionalna ureditev, s katero je prenos teh presežkov na prevzemno družbo omejen)

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62022CO0612: Order of the Court of 5 December 2022.#Tigercat International Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-612/22 P.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62022CO0571: Order of the Court of 5 December 2022.#Unite the Union v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-571/22 P.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62022CO0594: Order of the Court of 5 December 2022.#Gugler France v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-594/22 P.

EUR LEX - RSS