CELEX:62020CJ0702: Sodba Sodišča (veliki senat) z dne 12. januarja 2023.#SIA „DOBELES HES” in Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija proti Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija in drugi.#Predloga(i) za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki sta ju vložili Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Predhodno odločanje – Državne pomoči – Člen 107(1) PDEU – Nacionalna ureditev, ki javnemu subjektu nalaga obveznost, da se oskrbuje pri proizvajalcih električne energije iz obnovljivih virov po višji ceni, kot je tržna – Neizplačilo dela zadevne pomoči – Zahtevek za nadomestilo, ki sta ga ta proizvajalca vložila pri javnem organu, ki je ločen od tistega, ki je načeloma na podlagi te nacionalne ureditve to pomoč dolžan izplačati, in katerega proračun je namenjen le zagotovitvi njegovega delovanja – Nova pomoč – Obveznost priglasitve – Pomoč de minimis – Uredba (EU) št. 1407/2013 – Člen 5(2) – Kumulacija – Upoštevanje zneskov pomoči, ki so že bili prejeti v referenčnem obdobju na podlagi navedene nacionalne ureditve.#Združeni zadevi C-702/20 in C-17/21.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62022CB0302: Case C-302/22: Order of the Court (Eight Chamber) of 3 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Eilenburg — Germany) — YS, RW v Freebird Airlines Europe Ltd. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Compensation for air passengers in the event of long delays to flights — Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation — Extraordinary circumstances — Collision between an aircraft and birds — Emergency braking manoeuvre leading to damage to the tyres of that aircraft)

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62022CB0056: Case C-56/22: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — PL v État belge (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CB0569: Case C-569/21: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Ministero dell’Interno, Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri v PF (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Social policy — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2000/78/EC — Article 2(2), Article 4(1) and Article 6(1) — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age — National legislation fixing a maximum age limit of 30 years for the recruitment of technical psychologist commissioners — Justification)

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CB0113: Case C-113/21 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2022 — Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against leading businesspersons operating in Syria — Lists of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Proof that the inclusion of the appellant’s name on those lists is well founded — Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded)

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CA0578: Case C-578/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 November 2022 — Irish Wind Farmers’ Association Clg, Carrons Windfarm Ltd, Foyle Windfarm Ltd, Greenoge Windfarm Ltd v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Article 107(1) TFEU — Article 108(2) and (3) TFEU — Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Article 4 — Member State legislation on business property taxation — Methods for valuation of property used to calculate the basis of assessment of the rate payable — Complaint from wind farm operators — Allegation of an under-assessment of the basis of assessment for the business rate payable by fossil fuel electricity producers and, consequently, of a level of business rate of those electricity generators lower than that of other electricity producers due to the choice of valuation method used — Preliminary examination procedure — Decision finding that there is no State aid — No economic and selective advantage — Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Concept of ‘serious difficulties’ — Extent of the European Commission’s investigative duty — Principle of sound administration — Obligation to conduct the investigation procedure diligently and impartially — Scope of review by the General Court of the European Union)

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CA0443: Case C-443/21: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Piteşti — Romania) — SC Avicarvil Farms SRL v Ministerul Agriculturii şi Dezvoltării Rurale, Agenţia pentru Finanţarea Investiţiilor Rurale, Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie în Agricultură, Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie în Agricultură — Centrul Judeţean Vâlcea (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy (CAP) — European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 — Article 40 — National rural development programme 2007-2013 — Animal welfare payments — Calculation errors — Reductions in payments by the national authorities — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of legal certainty)

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CA0350: Case C-350/21: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings initiated by the Spetsializirana prokuratura (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector — Confidentiality of communications — Providers of electronic communications services — General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data for a period of six months — Combating serious crime — Access to the retained data — Informing the data subjects — Right to a remedy — Directive 2002/58/EC — Article 15(1) and (2) — Directive (EU) 2016/680 — Articles 13 and 54 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7, 8, 11 and 47 and Article 52(1))

EUR LEX - RSS