CELEX:62019CJ0938: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#Energieversorgungscenter Dresden-Wilschdorf GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2003/87/EC – Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme – Article 2(1) – Scope – Article 3(e) – Concept of ‘installation’ – Effect on emissions and pollution – Ancillary units not generating as such greenhouse gas emissions – Article 10a – Transitional rules for free allocation of allowances – Data Collection Template – Corrected eligibility ratio – Method of calculation – Decision 2011/278/EU – Third subparagraph of Article 6(1) – Export of cooling to an entity that belongs to a sector exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage.#Case C-938/19.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62020CJ0388: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Dr. August Oetker Nahrungsmittel KG.#Appeal – State aid – Toll-motorway concession – Law providing for an exemption from tolls for certain vehicles – Compensation granted to the concession holder by the Member State for loss of revenue – Shadow toll – Compensation found by the European Commission to be excessive and to include State aid – Commission decision declaring that aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Procedural rights of the aid beneficiary – Commission’s obligation to exercise particular vigilance – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Advantage – Improvement of the concession holder’s expected financial situation – Criterion of the private operator in a market economy – Distortion of the evidence – Breach of the obligation to state reasons – Misreading of the decision at issue – Substitution of grounds – Reversal of the burden of proof – Breach of the principle of primacy of EU law – Judicial review to be conducted by the General Court – Requirements and limits.#Case C-388/20.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62020CJ0398: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#ELVOSPOL v Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 90 – Reduction of the taxable amount for VAT purposes – Total or partial non-payment of the price on account of the debtor’s insolvency – Conditions imposed by national legislation for the adjustment of output VAT – Condition that the claim not paid in whole or in part must not have arisen during the six-month period preceding the declaration of insolvency of the debtor company – Non-compliance.#Case C-398/20.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62020CJ0340: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 November 2021.#Bank Sepah v Overseas Financial Limited and Oaktree Finance Limited.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran – Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 – Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies recognised by the Council of the European Union as being engaged in nuclear proliferation – Concepts of ‘freezing of funds’ and ‘freezing of economic resources’ – Possibility of applying a protective measure in respect of frozen funds and economic resources – Claim pre-dating the freezing of assets and unrelated to Iran’s nuclear and ballistic programme.#Case C-340/20.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62020CJ0106:           Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 11 novembre 2021.#République hellénique contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique agricole commune – FEAGA et Feader – Dépenses exclues du financement de l’Union européenne – Dépenses effectuées par la République hellénique – Procédure d’apurement de conformité – Moyen invoqué pour la première fois lors de la procédure orale en première instance – Règlement (CE) no 796/2004 – Article 2, point 2 – Règlement (UE) no 1307/2013 – Article 4, paragraphe 1, sous h) – Notion de “pâturages permanents” – Dénaturation d’éléments de preuve – Règlement délégué (UE) no 907/2014 – Article 12, paragraphe 4 – Correction ponctuelle – Conditions – Charge de la preuve.#Affaire C-106/20 P.

EUR LEX - RSS
This document does not exist in English.