Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62022CO0315: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 December 2022.#Ahmad Aziz v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents allegedly held by the European External Action Service (EEAS) – Action directed against the implied rejection of the request for access to documents – Admissibility – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Sufficiently clear and precise statement of the pleas in law relied on – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-315/22 P.
Več o... »
CELEX:62022CO0317: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 November 2022.#Ahmad Aziz v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents allegedly held by the European External Action Service (EEAS) – Action directed against the express rejection of the request for access to documents – Admissibility – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Sufficiently clear and precise statement of the pleas in law relied on – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-317/22 P.
Več o... »
CELEX:62022CO0144:           Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 15 décembre 2022.#Società Eredi Raimondo Bufarini Srl – Servizi Ambientali contre Ministero dell’Interno e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Articles 53 et 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Article 267 TFUE – Portée de l’obligation de renvoi des juridictions nationales statuant en dernier ressort – Exceptions à cette obligation – Critères – Situations dans lesquelles l’interprétation correcte du droit de l’Union s’impose avec une telle évidence qu’elle ne laisse place à aucun doute raisonnable – Condition pour la juridiction nationale statuant en dernier ressort d’être convaincue que la même évidence s’imposerait également aux autres juridictions de dernier ressort des États membres et à la Cour.#Affaire C-144/22.
This document does not exist in English.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0656: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#IM Gestão de Ativos (IMGA) – Sociedade Gestora de Organismos de Investimento Coletivo SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa – CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2008/7/EC – Article 5(2)(a) – Indirect taxes on the raising of capital – Stamp duty on services relating to the marketing of shares in undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities.#Case C-656/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62020CJ0530: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#SIA ‘EUROAPTIEKA’ v Ministru kabinets.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 86(1) – Concept of ‘advertising of medicinal products’ – Article 87(3) – Rational use of medicinal products – Article 90 – Prohibited advertising methods – Advertising of medicinal products not subject to medical prescription and not reimbursed – Advertising by price – Advertising of promotional offers – Advertising of bundled sales – Prohibition.#Case C-530/20.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CO0476: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 10 December 2021.#Rezon OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-476/21 P.
Več o... »
CELEX:62020CO0598: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#„Pilsētas zemes dienests” AS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions – Article 135(1)(l) and Article 135(2) – Leasing and letting of immovable property – Exclusion from exemption of a compulsory land lease to owners of buildings – Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Case C-598/20.
Več o... »