Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62021CJ0339: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#Colt Technology Services SpA and Others v Ministero della Giustizia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive (EU) 2018/1972 – Article 13 – Conditions attached to the general authorisation – Annex I, Part A, point 4 – Enabling of legal interception by competent national authorities – Article 3 – General objectives – National legislation on the reimbursement of costs associated with interception activities that telecommunications operators are ordered by the judicial authorities to carry out – Absence of full reimbursement mechanism – Principles of non-discrimination, proportionality and transparency.#Case C-339/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0351: Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 16. marca 2023.#ZG proti Beobank SA.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Justice de paix du canton de Forest.#Predhodno odločanje – Približevanje zakonodaj – Plačilne storitve na notranjem trgu – Direktiva 2007/64/ES – Člen 47(1)(a) – Informacije za plačnika po prejemu njegovega plačilnega naloga – Členi 58, 60 in 61 – Odgovornost ponudnika plačilnih storitev za neodobrene transakcije – Obveznost tega ponudnika, da temu plačniku povrne neodobrene transakcije – Okvirne pogodbe – Obveznost navedenega ponudnika, da navedenemu plačniku posreduje informacije o zadevnem prejemniku plačila.#Zadeva C-351/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0339: Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 16. marca 2023.#Colt Technology Services SpA in drugi proti Ministero della Giustizia in drugi.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Consiglio di Stato.#Predhodno odločanje – Elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve – Direktiva (EU) 2018/1972 – Člen 13 – Pogoji, ki so lahko vezani na splošno odobritev – Priloga I, del A, točka 4 – Omogočanje zakonitega prestrezanja s strani pristojnih nacionalnih organov – Člen 3 – Splošni cilji – Nacionalna ureditev povračila stroškov, nastalih pri opravljanju dejavnosti prestrezanja, ki so ga telekomunikacijskim operaterjem odredili pravosodni organi – Neobstoj mehanizma celotnega povračila – Načela nediskriminacije, sorazmernosti in preglednosti.#Zadeva C-339/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0522: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#MS v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pfälzisches Oberlandesgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Protection of plant varieties – Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 – Derogation provided for in Article 14(3) – Article 94(2) – Infringement – Right to compensation – Regulation (EC) No 1768/95 – Article 18(2) – Compensation for damage – Minimum lump sum calculated on the basis of quadruple the licence fee – Competence of the European Commission – Invalidity.#Case C-522/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0449: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#Towercast v Autorité de la concurrence and Ministère de l’Économie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Control of concentrations between undertakings – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Article 21(1) – Exclusive application of that regulation to operations covered by the concept of ‘concentration’ – Scope – Concentration operation which has no Community dimension, is below the thresholds for mandatory ex ante control laid down in the law of a Member State and has not been referred to the European Commission – Control of such an operation by the competition authorities of that Member State in the light of Article 102 TFEU – Whether permissible.#Case C-449/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0438: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#European Commission and Others v Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma S.A.#Appeal – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Application for marketing authorisation for a generic version of the medicinal product Tecfidera – Decision of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) not to validate the application for marketing authorisation – Earlier European Commission decision taking the view that Tecfidera was not covered by the same global marketing authorisation as Fumaderm – Previously authorised combination medicinal product – Subsequent marketing authorisation for a component of the combination medicinal product – Assessment of the existence of a global marketing authorisation.#Joined Cases C-438/21 P to C-440/21 P.
Več o... »
CELEX:62022CO0580: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 January 2023.#bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-580/22 P.
Več o... »