Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....
CELEX:62021CA0205: Case C-205/21, Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti (Recording of biometric and genetic data by the police): Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against V.S. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Directive (EU) 2016/680 — Article 4(1)(a) to (c) — Principles relating to processing of personal data — Purpose limitation — Data minimisation — Article 6(a) — Clear distinction between personal data of different categories of data subjects — Article 8 — Lawfulness of processing — Article 10 — Transposition — Processing of biometric data and genetic data — Concept of ‘processing authorised by Member State law’ — Concept of ‘strictly necessary’ — Discretion — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7, 8, 47, 48 and 52 — Right to effective judicial protection — Presumption of innocence — Limitation — Intentional criminal offence subject to public prosecution — Accused persons — Collection of photographic and dactyloscopic data in order for them to be entered in a record and taking of a biological sample for the purpose of creating a DNA profile — Procedure for enforcement of collection — Systematic nature of the collection)
13 March, 2023
No Comments
CELEX:62021CA0403: Case C-403/21, NV Construct: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiliul Naţional de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor — Romania) — SC NV Construct SRL v Județul Timiș (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ — Criteria — Independence and compulsory nature of the jurisdiction of the national body concerned — Stability of the members of that body — Directive 2014/24/EU — Public procurement procedures — Article 58 — Selection criteria — Possibility of including, amongst those criteria, obligations under special laws applicable to the activities connected with the contract in question and not set out as a criterion for selection in the procurement documents — Article 63(1) — Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority — Not possible to require recourse to subcontracting)
13 March, 2023
No Comments
CELEX:62021CA0158: Case C-158/21, Puig Gordi and Others: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 31 January 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Criminal proceedings against Lluís Puig Gordi and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Surrender procedures between Member States — Conditions for execution — Jurisdiction of the issuing judicial authority — Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right of access to a tribunal previously established by law — Possibility of issuing a new European arrest warrant relating to the same person)
13 March, 2023
No Comments
CELEX:62022CJ0009: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#NJ and OZ v An Bord Pleanála and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2001/42/EC – Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment – Article 2(a) – Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ – Article 3(2)(a) – Environmental assessment – Non-statutory act prepared by a municipal council and a developer – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment – Article 3(1) – Obligation to identify, describe and assess in an appropriate manner, in the light of each individual case, the direct and indirect effects of a project – Binding ministerial guidelines on building height.#Case C-9/22.
10 March, 2023
No Comments
e-klop – EPA 300-IX Zakon o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o davčnem potrjevanju računov
10 March, 2023
No Comments
UPRS Sodba I U 1499/2021-79
10 March, 2023
No Comments
Tretji osebi, ki je v zahtevi prosilke in v izreku izpodbijane odločbe poimensko navedena, pred izdajo izpodbijane odločbe v upravnem postopku ne na prvi in tudi ne na drugi stopnji upravnega odločanja ni bila dana možnost, da bi se skladno z določili 9. člena ZUP in 146. člena ZUP v povezavi z 22. členom Ustave izjavila o dejstvih in okoliščinah, ki so pomembne za odločitev. Posledično je tožena stranka (vsaj) preuranjeno zaključila, da je treba pritožbi ugoditi in prvostopenjsko odločbo odpraviti, pri čemer je ostalo nepojasnjeno njeno stališče (cit): “da mora organ zavezanec omogočiti dostop do dokumentov, ki se nahajajo v informatiziranih podatkovnih zbirkah, čeprav priklic iz zbirke, tehnično gledano, vedno pomeni nastanek (ustvarjanje) novega dokumenta”, kar onemogoča preizkus pravilnosti in zakonitosti izpodbijane odločbe.
UPRS Sklep in sodba I U 1827/2018-14
10 March, 2023
No Comments
Tožniku v postopku pred izdajo izpodbijanega sklepa ni bila izdana odmerna odločba niti ni imel možnosti kakršnekoli prijave v postopku na prvi stopnji. Izpodbijana odločitev sloni na pravni podlagi druge povedi prvega odstavka 148. člena ZDavP-2, za katero je Ustavno sodišče RS ugotovilo, da je neustavna in kot način izvršitve določilo, da lahko davčni organ izvršbo zoper poroka v smislu druge povedi prvega odstvka 148. člena ZDavP-2 opravi le, če pred tem izda odmerno odločbo, s katero ugotovi, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za poroštvo, pred njeno izdajo pa poroku zagotovi pravico do izjave. Glede na odločbo Ustavnega sodišča RS U-I-517/18-10 v obravnavani zadevi ni pravne podlage za izdajo izpodbijanega sklepa o davčni izvršbi tožniku.
UPRS Sodba I U 892/2020-9
10 March, 2023
No Comments
Na podlagi 55. člena ZDDPO-2 lahko zavezanec po tem zakonu uveljavlja davčno olajšavo za vlaganja v RR v višini 100 % zneska, ki predstavlja vlaganja v raziskave in razvoj. Pravilnik o uveljavljanju davčnih olajšav za vlaganja v raziskave in razvoj pa podrobneje navaja vrsto in vsebino vlaganj, ki štejejo za vlaganja v RR, vrsto stroškov, ki se lahko vključijo v znesek vlaganj v RR ter dodatne opredelitve kriterijev in meril pa presojo vlaganj v RR. Osnovno merilo za opredelitev, da gre za RR je, da mora biti pri RR prisoten pomemben element novosti in razreševanje znanstvene oz. tehnološke nejasnosti. Iz dejanskega stanja, navedenega v obrazložitvi izpodbijane odločbe, pa ne izhaja, da bi tožnik predhodno naveden pogoj tudi izkazal.
- Blog o davkih – članki(42)
- CFE novice(14)
- Državni zbor RS – zakoni(4078)
- EUR LEX – RSS(86946)
- FURS novice fizične osebe – RSS(35764)
- Izjave ZDSS za javnost(16)
- Izobraževanja in izobraževalni dogodki ZDSS(86)
- Novice DFP(50)
- Novice in stališča ZDSS-ja (izjave za javnost, strokovna stališča)(59)
- Novice RSS FURS podjetja(62495)
- Novice sodbe slovenskih sodišč DAVKI RSS(1479)
- Novice ZDSS – razpisi in druge koristne informacije(12)
- Novice ZDSS (Dogodki, obvestila…) – vsa lastna obvestila ZDSS(198)
- Obvestila ZDSS – delovanje organov ZDSS(18)
- Strokovna mnenja ZDSS(7)
- ZDSS v drugih medijih(4)
Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?
Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko



