Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....
CELEX:62020CJ0302: Sodba Sodišča (veliki senat) z dne 15. marca 2022.#M. A proti Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF).#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Cour d’appel de Paris.#Predhodno odločanje – Enotni trg za finančne storitve – Zloraba trga – Direktivi 2003/6/ES in 2003/124/ES – ,Notranja informacija‘ – Pojem – Informacija, ,ki ima natančno določene lastnosti‘ – Informacija o skorajšnji objavi članka, v katerem se bo poročalo o govorici na trgu v zvezi z izdajateljem finančnih instrumentov – Protipravnost razkritja notranje informacije – Izjeme – Uredba (EU) št. 596/2014 – Člen 10 – Razkritje notranje informacije v okviru običajnega opravljanja poklica – Člen 21 – Razkritje notranje informacije za novinarske namene – Svoboda tiska in svoboda izražanja – Razkritje informacije, da bo kmalu objavljen članek, s strani novinarja običajnemu viru.#Zadeva C-302/20.
16 March, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62019TJ0684: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 March 2022.#Magyar Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal (MEKH) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Regulation (EU) 2017/459 – Network code adopted by the Commission including an ‘incremental capacity process’ – ACER decision approving the implementation of an incremental capacity project – Plea of illegality – Lack of competence of the Commission – Article 6(11), Article 7(3) and Article 8(6) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2009.#Case T-684/19.
16 March, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020TJ0249: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 March 2022.#Abdelkader Sabra v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Errors of assessment – Criterion of a leading businessperson operating in Syria – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Rebuttal of the presumption.#Case T-249/20.
16 March, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62021TJ0281: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 March 2022.#Nowhere Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark APE TEES – Earlier national non-registered figurative trade marks representing an ape – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Rules governing common-law actions for passing-off – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and Euratom.#Case T-281/21.
16 March, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020CJ0302: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 March 2022.#M. A v Autorité des marchés financiers.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Single Market for financial services – Market abuse – Directives 2003/6/EC and 2003/124/EC – ‘Inside information’ – Concept – Information ‘of a precise nature’ – Information relating to the forthcoming publication of a press article reporting a market rumour about an issuer of financial instruments – Unlawfulness of the disclosure of inside information – Exceptions – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 10 – Disclosure of inside information in the normal exercise of a profession – Article 21 – Disclosure of inside information for the purpose of journalism – Freedom of the press and freedom of expression – Disclosure by a journalist, to a usual source, of information relating to the forthcoming publication of a press article.#Case C-302/20.
16 March, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62019CJ0167: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#European Commission v Freistaat Bayern and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Aid in favour of the German dairy sector – Financing of milk quality tests – Article 108(2) TFUE – Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 – Article 6(1) – Obligation for the European Commission to summarise the relevant issues of fact and law in that decision – Scope – Rights of interested parties to be involved in the administrative procedure – Breach of an essential procedural requirement – Consequences for the lawfulness of the final decision.#Joined Cases C-167/19 P and C-171/19 P.
16 March, 2022
No Comments
UPRS Sodba III U 45/2019-23
16 March, 2022
No Comments
V obrazložitvi izpodbijanih sklepov niso navedene konkretne ugotovitve glede vročanja odmernih odločb, ki so izvršilni naslovi, na podlagi katerih bi bilo mogoče napraviti zaključke o pravilni vročitvi in posledično izvršljivosti teh odločb. Zato ni zadostne podlage za zaključek, da je bilo za izdajo izpodbijanih sklepov relevantno procesno dejansko stanje v celoti pravilno ugotovljeno.
- Blog o davkih – članki(42)
- CFE novice(14)
- Državni zbor RS – zakoni(4078)
- EUR LEX – RSS(43672)
- FURS novice fizične osebe – RSS(28439)
- Izjave ZDSS za javnost(16)
- Izobraževanja in izobraževalni dogodki ZDSS(75)
- Novice DFP(42)
- Novice in stališča ZDSS-ja (izjave za javnost, strokovna stališča)(60)
- Novice RSS FURS podjetja(47668)
- Novice sodbe slovenskih sodišč DAVKI RSS(1349)
- Novice ZDSS – razpisi in druge koristne informacije(12)
- Novice ZDSS (Dogodki, obvestila…) – vsa lastna obvestila ZDSS(171)
- Obvestila ZDSS – delovanje organov ZDSS(18)
- Strokovna mnenja ZDSS(7)
- ZDSS v drugih medijih(4)
Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?
Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

