Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62021CJ0572: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#CC v VO.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility – Parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 8(1) and Article 61(a) – General jurisdiction – Perpetuatio fori principle – Transfer, during the proceedings, of the habitual residence of a child from a Member State of the European Union to a third State that is party to the 1996 Hague Convention.#Case C-572/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0110: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#Universität Bremen v European Research Executive Agency.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of non-privileged parties in a direct action before the Courts of the European Union – University teacher – University teacher teaching at the university represented in that action and performing duties as coordinator and head of the project that is the subject matter of the dispute – Condition of independence – Existence of a direct and personal interest in the outcome of the dispute.#Case C-110/21 P.
Več o... »
CELEX:62020CJ0436:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Vierte Kammer) vom 14. Juli 2022.#Asociación Estatal de Entidades de Servicios de Atención a Domicilio (ASADE) gegen Consejería de Igualdad y Políticas Inclusivas.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Art. 49 und 56 AEUV – Rein interner Sachverhalt – Dienstleistungen im Binnenmarkt – Richtlinie 2006/123/EG – Anwendungsbereich – Art. 2 Abs. 2 Buchst. j – Vergabe öffentlicher Aufträge – Richtlinie 2014/24/EU – Begriff ‚öffentliche Aufträge‘ – Art. 74 bis 77 – Erbringung personenbezogener sozialer Unterstützungsleistungen – Vereinbarungen der konzertierten Aktion mit privaten Einrichtungen der Sozialinitiative – Ausschluss von Wirtschaftsteilnehmern, die einen Erwerbszweck verfolgen – Ort der Ansässigkeit der Einrichtung als Auswahlkriterium.#Rechtssache C-436/20.
This document does not exist in English.
Več o... »
CELEX:62019CJ0743: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#European Parliament v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Law governing the institutions – Bodies, offices and agencies of the European Union – European Labour Authority (ELA) – Competence to determine the location of the seat – Article 341 TFEU – Scope – Decision adopted by the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States in the margins of a Council meeting – Jurisdiction of the Court under Article 263 TFEU – Author and legal nature of the act – Absence of binding effects in the EU legal order.#Case C-743/19.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0036: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#Sense Visuele Communicatie en Handel vof (agissant également sous le nom De Scharrelderij) v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Direct support schemes – Common rules – Article 30(6) and Article 50(2) – Application for payment entitlements from the national reserve for young farmers – National administrative authority which has given incorrect information about the classification of a person as a ‘young farmer’ – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations – Action seeking reparation for loss or harm based on the failure to comply with the national law principle of legitimate expectations.#Case C-36/21.
Več o... »
CELEX:62021CJ0274: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 July 2022.#EPIC Financial Consulting Ges.m.b.H. v Republik Österreich and Bundesbeschaffung GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Not applicable to procedures for granting an interlocutory injunction and review procedures as referred to in Article 2 of Directive 89/665/EEC in the absence of an international element – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 33 – Treatment of a framework agreement as a contract, for the purposes of Article 2a(2) of Directive 89/665 – Not possible to award a new public contract where the quantity and/or maximum value of the works, supplies or services concerned laid down by the framework agreement has or have already been reached – National legislation providing for the payment of fees for access to administrative proceedings in the field of public procurement – Obligations to determine and pay the fees for access to proceedings before the court rules on an application for an interlocutory injunction or an action for review – Non-transparent procedure for the award of a public contract – Principles of effectiveness and equivalence – Effectiveness – Right to an effective remedy – Directive 89/665 – Articles 1, 2 and 2a – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – National legislation providing for the dismissal of an action for review where the fees for access to proceedings have not been paid – Determination of the estimated value of a public contract.#Joined Cases C-274/21 and C-275/21.
Več o... »