Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....
CELEX:62021TA0479: Case T-479/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Haswani v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Res judicata — Error of assessment — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to a fair trial)
August 8, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62021TA0356: Case T-356/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Future Motion v EUIPO — El Corte Inglés (HYPERCORE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark HYPERCORE — Earlier EU figurative mark HIPERCOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
August 8, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62021TA0329: Case T-329/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — V. Fraas (FRAAS) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark FRAAS — Genuine use of a mark — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use)
August 8, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62021TA0122: Case T-122/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — QI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Evaluation report — 2018 and 2019 evaluation exercises — Unsatisfactory evaluation of managerial performance — General implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Validation procedure — Principle of impartiality — Manifest error of assessment)
August 8, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62021TA0029: Case T-29/21: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Beveland v EUIPO — Super B (BUCANERO) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark BUCANERO — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 58(1) point (a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark — Proof of genuine use)
August 8, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020TA0657: Case T-657/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Ryanair v Commission (Finnair II; Covid-19) (State aid — Finnish air-transport market — Aid granted by Finland to Finnair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic — Recapitalisation of an airline by its public and private shareholders on a pro rata basis in proportion to the previously existing ownership structure — Decision not to raise any objections — Temporary Framework for State aid measures — Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State — Derogation from certain requirements of the temporary framework — No weighing of the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition — Equal treatment — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Obligation to state reasons)
August 8, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020TA0739: Case T-739/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Unite the Union v EUIPO — WWRD Ireland (WATERFORD) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark WATERFORD — Action for annulment — Article 63(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Admissibility — Trade mark liable to mislead the public — Article 51(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))
August 8, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62019TA0584: Case T-584/19: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — thyssenkrupp v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Market for the production and distribution of flat carbon steel — Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Relevant market — Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition — Commitments — Obligation to state reasons)
August 8, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62022CO0032: Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Anheuser-Busch Inbev and Ampar v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – State aid – Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium – Admission of interventions in appeal proceedings against a judgment of the General Court – Annulment of the decision of the General Court – Referral of the case back to the General Court – Decision of the General Court refusing to place on the case file written observations on the judgment effecting that referral lodged by an intervener in the appeal – Implied decision of the General Court refusing to grant an intervener in the appeal the status of intervener before the General Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Status of intervener before the General Court of an intervener in the appeal.#Case C-32/22 P(I).
August 8, 2022
No Comments
- Blog o davkih – članki(42)
- CFE novice(14)
- Državni zbor RS – zakoni(3296)
- EUR LEX – RSS(18744)
- FURS novice fizične osebe – RSS(11395)
- Izjave ZDSS za javnost(15)
- Izobraževanja in izobraževalni dogodki ZDSS(55)
- Novice DFP(32)
- Novice in stališča ZDSS-ja (izjave za javnost, strokovna stališča)(60)
- Novice RSS FURS podjetja(19925)
- Novice sodbe slovenskih sodišč DAVKI RSS(1049)
- Novice ZDSS – razpisi in druge koristne informacije(12)
- Novice ZDSS (Dogodki, obvestila…) – vsa lastna obvestila ZDSS(134)
- Obvestila ZDSS – delovanje organov ZDSS(18)
- Strokovna mnenja ZDSS(6)
- ZDSS v drugih medijih(4)
Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?
Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko