Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62022CO0229: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 December 2022.#NC v Compania Naţională de Transporturi Aeriene Tarom SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1)(c)(iii) – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Cancellation of a flight – Right to compensation in the case of an offer of re-routing – Conditions – Divergence between different language versions of a provision of EU law – Re-routing allowing passengers to depart no more than one hour before their scheduled time of departure.#Case C-229/22.
Več o... »
CELEX:62022CO0229:           Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 2 décembre 2022.#NC contre Compania Naţională de Transporturi Aeriene Tarom SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Transports aériens – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Article 5, paragraphe 1, sous c), iii) – Indemnisation et assistance des passagers – Annulation d’un vol – Droit à indemnisation en cas d’offre de réacheminement – Conditions – Divergence entre les différentes versions linguistiques d’une disposition du droit de l’Union – Réacheminement permettant aux passagers de partir au plus tôt une heure avant l’heure de départ prévue.#Affaire C-229/22.
This document does not exist in English.
Več o... »
CELEX:62022CO0612: Order of the Court of 5 December 2022.#Tigercat International Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-612/22 P.
Več o... »
CELEX:62022CO0571: Order of the Court of 5 December 2022.#Unite the Union v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-571/22 P.
Več o... »
CELEX:62022CO0594: Order of the Court of 5 December 2022.#Gugler France v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-594/22 P.
Več o... »