admin – Page 2998 – ZDSS

Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

Bodite pozorni: vedno nova in vse več lažnih sporočil

November 16, 2022 No Comments

Zavezanci nas vsak dan že skoraj dva tedna obveščajo o sporočilih, ki naj bi jih dobili od Finančne uprave glede preplačila davka. Opozarjamo, da gre za poskuse prevare in lažna sporočila. Ne nasedajte in nikamor ne sporočajte ali vpisujte svojih podatkov.

CELEX:62019CO0859: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 novembre 2022.#Procédure pénale contre FX e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Article 19, paragraphe 1, second alinéa, TUE – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Lutte contre la corruption – Protection des intérêts financiers de l’Union – Article 325, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Convention PIF – Décision 2006/928/CE – Procédures pénales – Arrêts de la Curtea Constituțională (Cour constitutionnelle, Roumanie) concernant la composition des formations de jugement en matière de corruption grave – Obligation pour les juges nationaux de donner plein effet aux décisions de la Curtea Constituțională (Cour constitutionnelle) – Responsabilité disciplinaire des juges en cas de non-respect de ces décisions – Pouvoir de laisser inappliquées des décisions de la Curtea Constituțională (Cour constitutionnelle) non conformes au droit de l’Union – Principe de primauté du droit de l’Union.#Affaires jointes C-859/19, C-926/19 et C-929/19.

November 16, 2022 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62020CJ0646: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 November 2022.#Senatsverwaltung für Inneres und Sport, Standesamtsaufsicht v TB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility – Divorce – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 2(4) and Article 21 – Concept of ‘judgment’ – Recognition, in a Member State, of the dissolution of a marriage agreed in an agreement between spouses and pronounced by a civil registrar of another Member State – Criterion for determining the existence of a ‘judgment’.#Case C-646/20.

November 15, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62020CJ0646: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Große Kammer) vom 15. November 2022.#Senatsverwaltung für Inneres und Sport, Standesamtsaufsicht gegen TB.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Zivilsachen – Zuständigkeit, Anerkennung und Vollstreckung von Entscheidungen in Ehesachen und in Verfahren betreffend die elterliche Verantwortung – Ehescheidung – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2201/2003 – Art. 2 Nr. 4 und Art. 21 – Begriff ‚Entscheidung‘ – Anerkennung einer Eheauflösung in einem Mitgliedstaat, über die die Ehegatten in einer Vereinbarung übereingekommen sind und die von einem Standesbeamten eines anderen Mitgliedstaats ausgesprochen wurde – Kriterium für die Feststellung, ob eine ‚Entscheidung‘ vorliegt.#Rechtssache C-646/20.

November 15, 2022 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62022CO0405: Order of the Court of 8 November 2022.#Mandelay Magyarország Kereskedelmi Kft. (Mandelay Kft.) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-405/22 P.

November 15, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CJ0494: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#Eircom Limited v Commission for Communications Regulation.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Universal service and users’ rights – Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive) – Article 12 – Costing and financing of universal service obligations – Single universal service provider and multiple telecommunications services providers operating in the market – Determination as to whether an unfair burden exists.#Case C-494/21.

November 14, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CJ0385: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#Zenith Media Communications SRL v Consiliul Concurenţei.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Penalty imposed by the national competition authority – Determination of the amount of the fine – Consideration of turnover in the profit and loss account – Request for the national competition authority to take into account a different turnover – Refusal by the Competition Council – Real situation of the undertaking concerned – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-385/21.

November 14, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CJ0203: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#Criminal proceedings against DELTA STROY 2003.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhen sad – Burgas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA – Applicability – Imposition of a financial penalty on a legal person for non-payment of tax debts – Concept of ‘confiscation’ – Articles 48, 49 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Penalties of a criminal nature – Principles of the presumption of innocence and the legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties – Rights of the defence – Imposition of a criminal penalty on a legal person for an offence committed by the representative of that legal person – Parallel criminal proceedings against that representative that have not been concluded – Proportionality.#Case C-203/21.

November 14, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CJ0163: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#AD v PACCAR Inc and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Compensation for harm caused by a practice prohibited under Article 101(1) TFEU – Collusive arrangements on pricing and gross price increases for trucks in the European Economic Area (EEA) – Directive 2014/104/EU – Rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Article 22(2) – Applicability ratione temporis – First subparagraph of Article 5(1) – Concept of relevant evidence which lies in the control of the defendant or a third party – Article 5(2) – Disclosure of specified items of evidence or relevant categories of evidence on the basis of reasonably available facts – Article 5(3) – Review of the proportionality of the request to disclose evidence – Balancing the legitimate interests of the parties and third parties – Scope of the obligations resulting from those provisions.#Case C-163/21.

November 14, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62022TO0232: Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Growth Finance Plus AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-232/22.

November 14, 2022 No Comments

Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?

Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

Kdaj portal www.zdss.si pošilja obvestila?

Glej Tehnična opis delovanja spletne strani.