CELEX:62021CJ0449: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#Towercast v Autorité de la concurrence and Ministère de l’Économie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Control of concentrations between undertakings – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Article 21(1) – Exclusive application of that regulation to operations covered by the concept of ‘concentration’ – Scope – Concentration operation which has no Community dimension, is below the thresholds for mandatory ex ante control laid down in the law of a Member State and has not been referred to the European Commission – Control of such an operation by the competition authorities of that Member State in the light of Article 102 TFEU – Whether permissible.#Case C-449/21. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin21 March, 2023
CELEX:62021CJ0438: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#European Commission and Others v Pharmaceutical Works Polpharma S.A.#Appeal – Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Application for marketing authorisation for a generic version of the medicinal product Tecfidera – Decision of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) not to validate the application for marketing authorisation – Earlier European Commission decision taking the view that Tecfidera was not covered by the same global marketing authorisation as Fumaderm – Previously authorised combination medicinal product – Subsequent marketing authorisation for a component of the combination medicinal product – Assessment of the existence of a global marketing authorisation.#Joined Cases C-438/21 P to C-440/21 P. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin21 March, 2023
CELEX:62022CO0580: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 January 2023.#bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-580/22 P. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin21 March, 2023
CELEX:62022TJ0178: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#FA World Entertainment Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-178/22. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin21 March, 2023
CELEX:62022TJ0194: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#Zelmotor sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-194/22. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin21 March, 2023
CELEX:62022TN0693: Zadeva T-693/22: Tožba, vložena 12. novembra 2022 – Hilza/Komisija EUR LEX - RSSBy Admin Zdss P21 March, 2023
CELEX:62021TJ0727: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#TO v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Case T-727/21. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin21 March, 2023
CELEX:62022TJ0133: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-133/22. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin21 March, 2023
CELEX:62022TN0701: Zadeva T-701/22: Tožba, vložena 12. novembra 2022 – Pamastock Investments/Komisija EUR LEX - RSSBy Admin Zdss P21 March, 2023
CELEX:62022TN0698: Zadeva T-698/22: Tožba, vložena 12. novembra 2022 – Swan Lake/Komisija EUR LEX - RSSBy Admin Zdss P21 March, 2023