CELEX:62021CJ0033:           Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 19 mai 2022.#Istituto nazionale per l’assicurazione contro gli infortuni sul lavoro (INAIL) et Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) contre Ryanair DAC.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Travailleurs migrants – Sécurité sociale – Législation applicable – Règlement (CEE) no 1408/71 – Article 14, point 2, sous a), i) et ii) – Règlement (CE) no 883/2004 – Article 11, paragraphe 5 – Article 13, paragraphe 1, sous a) et b) – Notion de “base d’affectation” – Personnel navigant – Travailleurs exerçant leur activité salariée sur le territoire de deux ou de plusieurs États membres – Critères de rattachement.#Affaire C-33/21.

EUR LEX - RSS
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62020CJ0569:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 19 mai 2022.#IR contre Spetsializirana prokuratura.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive (UE) 2016/343 – Article 8 – Droit d’assister à son procès – Information sur la tenue du procès – Impossibilité de localiser la personne poursuivie nonobstant les efforts raisonnables déployés par les autorités compétentes – Possibilité d’un procès et d’une condamnation par défaut – Article 9 – Droit à un nouveau procès ou à une autre voie de droit permettant une nouvelle appréciation du fond de l’affaire.#Affaire C-569/20.

EUR LEX - RSS
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62020CJ0466:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Vierte Kammer) vom 19. Mai 2022.#HEITEC AG gegen HEITECH Promotion GmbH und RW.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Marken – Richtlinie 2008/95/EG – Art. 9 – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 207/2009 – Art. 54, 110 und 111 – Verwirkung durch Duldung – Begriff der Duldung – Unterbrechung der Verwirkungsfrist – Abmahnung – Zeitpunkt der Unterbrechung der Verwirkungsfrist bei Einlegung eines gerichtlichen Rechtsbehelfs – Wirkungen der Verwirkung – Ansprüche auf Schadensersatz, Auskunft und Vernichtung von Waren.#Rechtssache C-466/20.

EUR LEX - RSS
This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62019CJ0869: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#L v Unicaja Banco SA ,anciennement Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria, S.A.U.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Mortgage agreement – Unfairness of the ‘floor clause’ in the agreement – National rules concerning the judicial appeal procedure – Limitation of the temporal effects of the declaration that an unfair term is void – Restitution – Power of review by the national appeal court of its own motion.#Case C-869/19.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62019CJ0725: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#IO v Impuls Leasing România IFN SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sector 2 Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Enforcement proceedings in respect of a leasing contract constituting an enforceable instrument – Objection to enforcement – National legislation not allowing the court hearing that objection to determine whether the terms of an enforceable instrument are unfair – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion whether a term is unfair – Existence of an action under ordinary law allowing the review of whether those terms were unfair – Requirement of a security in order to suspend the enforcement proceedings.#Case C-725/19.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62019CJ0693: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#SPV Project 1503 Srl and Others v YB and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Payment order and attachment proceedings against third parties – Force of res judicata implicitly covering the validity of the terms of an enforceable instrument – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term.#Joined Cases C-693/19 and C-831/19.

EUR LEX - RSS