March 2022 – Page 49 – www.zdss.si

Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62018TJ0671: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 October 2021.#ZU v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Transfer in the interests of the service – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment – Article 25 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence and the right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of sound administration and duty to have regard for the welfare of staff – Article 22a of the Staff Regulations – Misuse of powers – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Refusal of the request – 2017 appraisal exercise – Appraisal report – 2018 promotion exercise – Proposed non-promotion – Liability.#Joined Cases T-671/18 and T-140/19.

4 March, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62020CJ0171: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#WV v European External Action Service.#Case C-171/20 P.

4 March, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62020CJ0162: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#WV v European External Action Service.#Case C-162/20 P.

4 March, 2022 No Comments

Pripombe in predlogi Zbornice davčnih svetovalcev Slovenije (ZDSS) k Predlogu Pravilnika o uveljavljanju davčnih olajšav za vlaganja v digitalni in zeleni prehod (EVA 2022-1611-0030)

4 March, 2022 No Comments

ZDSS je poslala dne 4.3.2022 na MF pripombe v zvezi s Pravilnikom o uveljavljanju davčnih olajšav. Predlog je skladen z napori ZDSS po izgradnji poštenega davčnega sistema pri nas.

CELEX:62017CO0558: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 February 2022.#OZ v European Investment Bank.#Taxation of costs.#Case C-558/17 P-DEP.

4 March, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CO0678: Order of the Court of 24 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-678/21 P.

4 March, 2022 No Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 931/2021-8

4 March, 2022 No Comments

Odločanje v ponovljenem postopku ne pomeni, da se postopek začne na novo, temveč, da se nadaljuje tam, kjer je bil pred izdajo prve odločbe tožene stranke. Navedeno za obravnavani primer pomeni, da bi se morala tožena stranka v izpodbijani odločbi opredeliti do tožnikovih ugovorov, da gre le za občasne prejemke ter tudi do predlaganega dokaza po opravi poizvedb pri tožnikovemu delodajalcu. Po presoji sodišča bi morala tožena stranka z opravo poizvedb pri tožnikovemu delodajalcu oziroma na drug ustrezen način ugotoviti dejansko stanje, ki v predmetni zadevi očitno ostaja sporno.

CELEX:62021CJ0562: Sodba Sodišča (veliki senat) z dne 22. februarja 2022.#X in Y.#Predloga za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ju je vložilo Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Predhodno odločanje – Nujni postopek predhodnega odločanja – Pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah – Evropski nalog za prijetje – Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ – Člen 1(3) – Postopki predaje med državami članicami – Pogoji izvršitve – Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah – Člen 47, drugi odstavek – Temeljna pravica do poštenega sojenja pred neodvisnim, nepristranskim in z zakonom predhodno ustanovljenim sodiščem – Sistemske ali splošne pomanjkljivosti – Preizkus v dveh fazah – Merila za uporabo – Obveznost izvršitvenega pravosodnega organa, da konkretno in natančno presodi, ali obstajajo resni in utemeljeni razlogi za prepričanje, da za osebo, v zvezi s katero je izdan evropski nalog za prijetje, v primeru njene predaje obstaja resnična nevarnost za kršitev njene temeljne pravice do poštenega sojenja pred neodvisnim, nepristranskim in z zakonom predhodno ustanovljenim sodiščem.#Združeni zadevi C-562/21 PPU in C-563/21 PPU.

3 March, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62020CJ0634: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#A v Sosiaali- ja terveysalan lupa- ja valvontavirasto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Scope – Conditions for obtaining authorisation to pursue the profession of doctor independently in the host Member State – Diploma issued in the home Member State – Right to pursue the profession of doctor limited to a period of three years – Supervision of a licensed doctor and concomitant completion of three years of special training in general medical practice – Articles 45 and 49 TFEU.#Case C-634/20.

3 March, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62020CJ0421: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 March 2022.#Acacia Srl v Bayerische Motoren Werke AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Community designs – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 82(5) – Action brought before the courts of the Member State in which an act of infringement has been committed or threatened – Claims supplementary to the action for infringement – Applicable law – Article 88(2) – Article 89(1)(d) – Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 – Law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) – Article 8(2) – Country in which the intellectual property right was infringed.#Case C-421/20.

3 March, 2022 No Comments

Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?

Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

Kdaj portal www.zdss.si pošilja obvestila?

Glej Tehnična opis delovanja spletne strani.