Daily Archives: 13 December, 2021

CELEX:62020TA0211: Case T-211/20: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Square v EUIPO — ($ Cash App) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark $ Cash App — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

CELEX:62019TA0823: Case T-823/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — JMS Sports v EUIPO — Inter-Vion (Spiral hair elastics) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered community design representing a spiral hair elastic — Disclosure of the earlier designs — Disclosure on the Internet — Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Equality of arms — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court)

CELEX:62020TA0112: Case T-112/20: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Intis v EUIPO — Televes (TELEVEND) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark TELEVEND — Earlier EU word mark TELEVES — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

CELEX:62019TA0790: Case T-790/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Novolipetsk Steel v Commission (Measures that the European Union may take in relation to the combined effect of anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures with safeguard measures — Importation of cold-rolled flat steel products and hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel — Modification of regulations imposing anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures on products subject to safeguard measures — Principle of non-discrimination — Manifest error of assessment)

CELEX:62018TA0671: Case T-671/18 and T-140/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — ZU v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Transfer in the interests of the service — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment — Article 25 of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence and the right to be heard — Manifest error of assessment — Principle of sound administration and duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Article 22a of the Staff Regulations — Misuse of powers — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Refusal of the request — 2017 appraisal exercise — Appraisal report — 2018 promotion exercise — Proposed non-promotion — Liability)

CELEX:62019TA0434: Case T-434/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Rosca v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Notice of competition — Open Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 — Decision of the selection board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Article 27 of the Staff Regulations — Equal treatment)

CELEX:62018TA0296: Case T-296/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Polskie Linie Lotnicze ‘LOT’ v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Air transport — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Relevant market — Assessment of the effects of the concentration on competition — Commitments — Obligation to state reasons)

CELEX:62018TA0240: Case T-240/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Polskie Linie Lotnicze ‘LOT’ v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Air transport — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Relevant market — Assessment of the effects of the concentration on competition — Absence of commitment — Obligation to state reasons)

CELEX:62016TA0191: Case T-191/16: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Lito Maieftiko Gynaikologiko kai Cheirourgiko Kentro v Commission (Financial assistance — Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002-2006) — Contract concerning Union financial assistance in favour of a project in the field of medical collaboration — Enforceable decision — Competence of the Commission — Grant agreements — Recovery of part of the financial contribution paid — Arbitration clause — Eligible costs — Legitimate expectations)

CELEX:62021CN0607: Case C-607/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 30 September 2021 — XXX v État belge