Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....
CELEX:62020TA0249: Case T-249/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2022 — Sabra v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Errors of assessment — Criterion of a leading businessperson operating in Syria — Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime — Rebuttal of the presumption)
16 May, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62021CN0743: Case C-743/21 P: Appeal brought on 2 December 2021 by Marina Yachting Brand Management Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 22 September 2021 in Case T-169/20, Marina Yachting Brand Management v EUIPO — Industries Sportswear
16 May, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020CA0151: Case C-151/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Nordzucker AG, Südzucker AG, Agrana Zucker GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Article 101 TFEU — Cartel prosecuted by two national competition authorities — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Non bis in idem principle — Existence of the same offence — Article 52(1) — Limitations to the non bis in idem principle — Conditions — Pursuit of an objective of general interest — Proportionality)
16 May, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62021TA0204: Case T-204/21: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2022 — Stryker v EUIPO (RUGGED) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark RUGGED — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Competence of the Board of Appeal — Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
16 May, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020TA0113: Case T-113/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2022 — BSEF v Commission (Energy — Directive 2009/125/EC — Ecodesign requirements for electronic displays — Regulation (EU) 2019/2021 — Ban on halogenated flame retardants in the enclosure and stand of electronic displays — Competence of the author of the act — Manifest error of assessment — Legal certainty — Proportionality — Equal treatment)
16 May, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62021TA0197: Case T-197/21: Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2022 — Lea Nature Services v EUIPO — Debonair Trading Internacional (SO …?) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SO …? — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Lack of descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))
16 May, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62020CA0117: Case C-117/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — bpost SA v Autorité belge de la concurrence (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Postal services — Tariff system adopted by a universal service provider — Fine imposed by a national postal regulator — Fine imposed by a national competition authority — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Non bis in idem principle — Existence of the same offence — Article 52(1) — Limitations to the non bis in idem principle — Duplication of proceedings and penalties — Conditions — Pursuit of an objective of general interest — Proportionality)
16 May, 2022
No Comments
CELEX:62019CA0508: Case C-508/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — M.F. v J.M. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Interpretation sought by the referring court necessary to enable it to give judgment — Concept — Disciplinary proceedings brought against a judge of an ordinary court — Designation of the disciplinary court having jurisdiction to hear those proceedings by the President of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) — Civil action for a declaration that a service relationship does not exist between the President of that disciplinary chamber and the Supreme Court — Lack of jurisdiction of the referring court to review the validity of the appointment of a Supreme Court judge and inadmissibility of such an action under national law — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
16 May, 2022
No Comments
- Blog o davkih – članki(42)
- CFE novice(14)
- Državni zbor RS – zakoni(4078)
- EUR LEX – RSS(46417)
- FURS novice fizične osebe – RSS(28467)
- Izjave ZDSS za javnost(16)
- Izobraževanja in izobraževalni dogodki ZDSS(75)
- Novice DFP(43)
- Novice in stališča ZDSS-ja (izjave za javnost, strokovna stališča)(60)
- Novice RSS FURS podjetja(47723)
- Novice sodbe slovenskih sodišč DAVKI RSS(1349)
- Novice ZDSS – razpisi in druge koristne informacije(12)
- Novice ZDSS (Dogodki, obvestila…) – vsa lastna obvestila ZDSS(173)
- Obvestila ZDSS – delovanje organov ZDSS(18)
- Strokovna mnenja ZDSS(7)
- ZDSS v drugih medijih(4)
Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?
Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

