EUR LEX – RSS – Page 1416 – ZDSS

Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62020TJ0577: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 May 2022.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – German air transport market – Loan granted by Germany to Condor Flugdienst – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Intrinsic difficulties that are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties that are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Risk of disruption to an important service.#Case T-577/20.

May 18, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0869: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#L v Unicaja Banco SA ,anciennement Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria, S.A.U.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Mortgage agreement – Unfairness of the ‘floor clause’ in the agreement – National rules concerning the judicial appeal procedure – Limitation of the temporal effects of the declaration that an unfair term is void – Restitution – Power of review by the national appeal court of its own motion.#Case C-869/19.

May 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0725: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#IO v Impuls Leasing România IFN SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Enforcement proceedings in respect of a leasing contract constituting an enforceable instrument – Objection to enforcement – National legislation not allowing the court hearing that objection to determine whether the terms of an enforceable instrument are unfair – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion whether a term is unfair – Existence of an action under ordinary law allowing the review of whether those terms were unfair – Requirement of a security in order to suspend the enforcement proceedings.#Case C-725/19.

May 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0693: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#SPV Project 1503 Srl and Dobank SpA v YB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Payment order and attachment proceedings against third parties – Force of res judicata implicitly covering the validity of the terms of an enforceable instrument – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term.#Case C-693/19.

May 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0600: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#MA v Ibercaja Banco, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Mortgage enforcement proceedings – Unfairness of the term setting the nominal rate for default interest, and of the advanced repayment term in the loan agreement – Force of res judicata and time-barring – Loss of the possibility of relying on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court – Power of review by the national court of its own motion.#Case C-600/19.

May 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0693: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 17 mai 2022.#SPV Project 1503 Srl et Dobank SpA contre YB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Principe d’équivalence – Principe d’effectivité – Procédures d’injonction de payer et de saisie-arrêt auprès des tiers – Autorité de la chose jugée couvrant implicitement la validité des clauses du titre exécutoire – Pouvoir du juge de l’exécution d’examiner d’office le caractère éventuellement abusif d’une clause.#Affaire C-693/19.

May 17, 2022 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62019CJ0725: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 17 mai 2022.#IO contre Impuls Leasing România IFN SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Principe d’équivalence – Principe d’effectivité – Procédure d’exécution forcée d’un contrat de crédit-bail ayant la qualité de titre exécutoire – Opposition à l’exécution – Réglementation nationale ne permettant pas au juge saisi de cette opposition de vérifier le caractère abusif des clauses d’un titre exécutoire – Pouvoir du juge de l’exécution d’examiner d’office le caractère éventuellement abusif d’une clause – Existence d’un recours de droit commun permettant le contrôle du caractère abusif desdites clauses – Exigence d’une caution pour suspendre la procédure d’exécution.#Affaire C-725/19.

May 17, 2022 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62022CN0096: Zadeva C-96/22: Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugalska) 11. februarja 2022 — Companhia de Distribuição Integral Logista Portugal, S.A./Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

May 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62020CA0711: Zadeva C-711/20: Sodba Sodišča (deseti senat) z dne 24. marca 2022 (predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Nejvyšší správní soud – Češka republika) – Generální ředitelství cel/TanQuid Polska Sp. z o. o. (Predhodno odločanje – Trošarine – Direktiva 92/12/EGS – Člen 4 – Premik proizvodov pod režimom odloga plačila trošarine – Pogoji – Člena 6 in 20 – Sprostitev proizvodov v porabo – Ponareditev spremnega administrativnega dokumenta – Prekrški ali nepravilnosti, do katerih je prišlo med premikanjem trošarinskih proizvodov, ki so pod režimom odloga plačila trošarine – Nepravilna odprema proizvodov iz režima odloga plačila trošarine – Prejemnik, ki ne ve za premik – Goljufija, ki jo stori tretja oseba – Člen 13(a) in člen 15(3) – Obvezno jamstvo za gibanje – Obseg)

May 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62022CO0065: Order of the Court of 6 May 2022.#Industria de Diseño Textil, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-65/22 P.

May 17, 2022 No Comments

Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?

Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

Kdaj portal www.zdss.si pošilja obvestila?

Glej Tehnična opis delovanja spletne strani.