EUR LEX – RSS – Page 5441 – www.zdss.si

Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62020CA0605: Case C-605/20: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo -Portugal) — Suzlon Wind Energy Portugal — Energia Eólica Unipessoal, Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2(1)(c) — Applicability ratione temporis — Supplies subject to VAT — Supplies of services for consideration — Criteria — Intra-group relationship — Supplies consisting in repairing or replacing components of wind turbines under guarantee and preparing non-compliance reports — Debit notes issued by the supplier of services with no reference to VAT — Deduction by the supplier of the VAT charged on the goods and services for which it has been invoiced by its subcontractors in respect of those supplies)

19 April, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CN0817: Case C-817/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 21 December 2021 — R.I. v Inspecția Judiciară, N.L.

19 April, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CN0710: Case C-710/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 25 November 2021 — IEF Service GmbH v HB

19 April, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62020CA0590: Case C-590/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others v UK and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Coordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of activities of doctors — Directives 75/363/EEC and 82/76/EEC — Specialist medical training — Appropriate remuneration — Application of Directive 82/76/EEC to training begun before its entry into force and continuing after the date of expiry of the period prescribed for its transposition)

19 April, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CO0762: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-762/21 P.

18 April, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CO0761: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-761/21 P.

18 April, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62022CO0019: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 April 2022.#Sanford LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-19/22 P.

18 April, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CO0744: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#Henry Cotton’s Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-744/21 P.

18 April, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CO0743: Order of the Court (chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#Marina Yachting Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-743/21 P.

18 April, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CO0784: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 April 2022.#Wolfgang Kappes v Sedus Stoll AG and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-784/21 P.

18 April, 2022 No Comments

Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?

Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

Kdaj portal www.zdss.si pošilja obvestila?

Glej Tehnična opis delovanja spletne strani.