EUR LEX – RSS – Page 3952 – www.zdss.si

Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62021TJ0198: Urteil des Gerichts (Fünfte Kammer) vom 23. Februar 2022.#Ancor Group GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Widerspruchsverfahren – Unionswortmarke CODE‑X – Ältere nationale Wortmarke und ältere nationale Bildmarke Cody’s – Ältere internationale Bildmarke Cody’s – Relatives Eintragungshindernis – Keine Verwechslungsgefahr – Art. 8 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001.#Rechtssache T-198/21.

23 February, 2022 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62018TJ0540: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 February 2022.#ASL Aviation Holdings DAC and ASL Airlines (Ireland) Ltd v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Competition – Markets for international express small package delivery services in the EEA – Concentration – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market – Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court – General reference to other documents – Pleas in law or complaints raised by a third party in another case – Evidence submitted in the reply – No justification for the delay – Inadmissibility – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-540/18.

23 February, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CO0610: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 11 February 2022.#Svenska Metallkompaniet AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Article 170a(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – No request that the appeal be allowed to proceed – Appeal inadmissible.#Case C-610/21 P.

23 February, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CO0611: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 11 February 2022.#Lajos Bese v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Article 170a(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – No request that the appeal be allowed to proceed – Appeal inadmissible.#Case C-611/21 P.

23 February, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62020CJ0300: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#Bund Naturschutz in Bayern e.V. v Landkreis Rosenheim.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2001/42/EC – Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment – Article 2(a) – Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ – Article 3(2)(a) – Measures prepared for certain sectors and setting a framework for future development consent of projects listed in Annexes I and II to Directive 2011/92/EU – Article 3(4) – Measures setting a framework for future development consent of projects – Landscape conservation regulation adopted by a local authority.#Case C-300/20.

22 February, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CC0014: Conclusions de l’avocat général M. A. Rantos, présentées le 22 février 2022.###

22 February, 2022 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62020CJ0483: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#XXXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – Inadmissibility of an application for international protection lodged in a Member State by a third-country national who has obtained refugee status in another Member State, where the minor child of that third-country national, who is a beneficiary of subsidiary protection status, resides in the first Member State – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 7 – Right to respect for family life – Article 24 – Best interests of the child – No infringement of Articles 7 and 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights due to the inadmissibility of the application for international protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 23(2) – Obligation on the Member States to ensure the family unity of beneficiaries of international protection is maintained.#Case C-483/20.

22 February, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CJ0430: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Primacy of EU law – Lack of jurisdiction of a national court to examine the conformity with EU law of national legislation found to be constitutional by the constitutional court of the Member State concerned – Disciplinary proceedings.#Case C-430/21.

22 February, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62020CJ0160: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd and Others v Staatssecretaris van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/40/EU – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Products not complying with the maximum emission levels – Prohibition on placing on the market – Measurement method – Filter cigarettes with small ventilation holes – Measurement of the emissions on the basis of ISO standards – Standards not published in the Official Journal of the European Union – Compliance with the publication requirements laid down in Article 297(1) TFEU read in the light of the principle of legal certainty – Compliance with the principle of transparency.#Case C-160/20.

22 February, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62021CJ0562: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#X and Y v Openbaar Ministerie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Surrender procedures between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Two-step examination – Criteria for application – Obligation of the executing judicial authority to determine, specifically and precisely, whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the person in respect of whom a European arrest warrant has been issued, if surrendered, runs a real risk of breach of his or her fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law.#Joined Cases C-562/21 PPU and C-563/21 PPU.

22 February, 2022 No Comments

Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?

Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

Kdaj portal www.zdss.si pošilja obvestila?

Glej Tehnična opis delovanja spletne strani.