EUR LEX – RSS – Page 1280 – ZDSS

Prikaz vseh zadetkov portala ZDSS.....

CELEX:62019TJ0245: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 18 May 2022.#Uzina Metalurgica Moldoveneasca OAO v European Commission.#Safeguard measures – Market for steel products – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/159 – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Standing to bring proceedings – Admissibility – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Principle of sound administration – Duty of care – Threat of serious injury – Manifest error of assessment – Initiation of a safeguard investigation – Competence of the Commission – Rights of the defence.#Case T-245/19.

May 18, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62019TJ0609: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 May 2022 (Extracts).#Canon Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Medical equipment manufacturing sector – Decision imposing fines for implementing a concentration prior to notification and authorisation – Article 4(1), Article 7(1) and Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Interim transaction and ultimate transaction – Parking structure – Single concentration – Rights of the defence – Legitimate expectations – Principle of legality – Proportionality – Amount of fines – Mitigating circumstances.#Case T-609/19.

May 18, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62020TJ0296: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 May 2022 (Extracts).#Amer Foz v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to pursue an economic activity – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial – Determination of listing criteria.#Case T-296/20.

May 18, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62020TJ0577: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 May 2022.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – German air transport market – Loan granted by Germany to Condor Flugdienst – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Intrinsic difficulties that are not the result of an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties that are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Risk of disruption to an important service.#Case T-577/20.

May 18, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0869: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#L v Unicaja Banco SA ,anciennement Banco de Caja España de Inversiones, Salamanca y Soria, S.A.U.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Mortgage agreement – Unfairness of the ‘floor clause’ in the agreement – National rules concerning the judicial appeal procedure – Limitation of the temporal effects of the declaration that an unfair term is void – Restitution – Power of review by the national appeal court of its own motion.#Case C-869/19.

May 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0725: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#IO v Impuls Leasing România IFN SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Enforcement proceedings in respect of a leasing contract constituting an enforceable instrument – Objection to enforcement – National legislation not allowing the court hearing that objection to determine whether the terms of an enforceable instrument are unfair – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion whether a term is unfair – Existence of an action under ordinary law allowing the review of whether those terms were unfair – Requirement of a security in order to suspend the enforcement proceedings.#Case C-725/19.

May 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0693: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#SPV Project 1503 Srl and Dobank SpA v YB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Payment order and attachment proceedings against third parties – Force of res judicata implicitly covering the validity of the terms of an enforceable instrument – Power of the court hearing the enforcement proceedings to examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term.#Case C-693/19.

May 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0600: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022.#MA v Ibercaja Banco, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness – Mortgage enforcement proceedings – Unfairness of the term setting the nominal rate for default interest, and of the advanced repayment term in the loan agreement – Force of res judicata and time-barring – Loss of the possibility of relying on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court – Power of review by the national court of its own motion.#Case C-600/19.

May 17, 2022 No Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0693: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 17 mai 2022.#SPV Project 1503 Srl et Dobank SpA contre YB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Principe d’équivalence – Principe d’effectivité – Procédures d’injonction de payer et de saisie-arrêt auprès des tiers – Autorité de la chose jugée couvrant implicitement la validité des clauses du titre exécutoire – Pouvoir du juge de l’exécution d’examiner d’office le caractère éventuellement abusif d’une clause.#Affaire C-693/19.

May 17, 2022 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

CELEX:62019CJ0725: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 17 mai 2022.#IO contre Impuls Leasing România IFN SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Principe d’équivalence – Principe d’effectivité – Procédure d’exécution forcée d’un contrat de crédit-bail ayant la qualité de titre exécutoire – Opposition à l’exécution – Réglementation nationale ne permettant pas au juge saisi de cette opposition de vérifier le caractère abusif des clauses d’un titre exécutoire – Pouvoir du juge de l’exécution d’examiner d’office le caractère éventuellement abusif d’une clause – Existence d’un recours de droit commun permettant le contrôle du caractère abusif desdites clauses – Exigence d’une caution pour suspendre la procédure d’exécution.#Affaire C-725/19.

May 17, 2022 No Comments

This document does not exist in English.

Želite prejemati novice o davkih ?

Naroči se na novice ZDSS (informacije iz sodišč, FURS, ZDSS….). Novice boste prejemali 3 x tedensko

Kdaj portal www.zdss.si pošilja obvestila?

Glej Tehnična opis delovanja spletne strani.