Monthly Archives: October 2022

CELEX:62020TA0713: Case T-713/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — OQ v Commission (Civil service — Recruitment — Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/378/20 (AD 7) — Croatian-language lawyer-linguists at the Court of Justice of the European Union — Decision of the selection board not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition — Conditions for admission — Condition relating to a level of education corresponding to a full course of university studies leading to qualifications in Croatian law — Possession of French qualifications in law — Freedom of movement for workers — Action for annulment)

CELEX:62020TA0651: Case T-651/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — KL v EIB (Civil service — Personnel of the EIB — Unjustified absences — Failure to report for medical examination — Action for annulment and for damages)

CELEX:62022TN0532: Case T-532/22: Action brought on 28 August 2022 — Association of European Administrative Judges v Council

CELEX:62020TA0470: Case T-470/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — DD v FRA (Civil service — Temporary staff — Disciplinary regime — Removal from post — Opening of an administrative investigation — Initiation of disciplinary proceedings — Requirement for impartiality — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Articles 11, 12 and 21 of the Staff Regulations — Duty of loyalty — Legal certainty — Freedom of expression — Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Principle of sound administration — Duty of care — Presumption of innocence — Right to be heard — Reasonable period of time — Proportionality of the sanction)

CELEX:62020TA0529: Case T-529/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — LR v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Remuneration — Resettlement allowance — Establishment of a member of staff’s residence in his or her own home after leaving the service of the EIB — Second indent of the first paragraph of Article 13 of the EIB Staff Rules — Concept of ‘home’ — Literal interpretation according to a prevailing language version — Unlimited jurisdiction — Dispute of a financial character — Admissibility)

CELEX:62019TA0794: Case T-794/19: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — Set v Commission (State aid — Italian electricity market — Capacity mechanism — Decision not to raise objections — Availability of the electricity production capacity — Modification of the capacity mechanism — Serious difficulties — Procedural rights of interested parties — Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020)

CELEX:62020TA0217: Case T-217/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — Greece v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Greece — Rural Development — Key controls — Flat-rate financial corrections — Obligation to state reasons — Protection of legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Proportionality — Principle of sound administration)

CELEX:62019TA0793: Case T-793/19: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — Tirreno Power v Commission (State aid — Italian electricity market — Capacity mechanism — Decision not to raise objections — Availability of the electricity production capacity — Modification of the capacity mechanism — Serious difficulties — Procedural rights of interested parties — Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020)

CELEX:62020TA0091: Case T-91/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — WT v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Principle of good administration — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Reasonable time — Psychological harassment — Principle of legal certainty — Material and non-material damage)

CELEX:62019TA0631: Case T-631/19: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — BNetzA v ACER (Energy — Internal market in electricity — Regulation (EU) 2019/942 — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER — Action for annulment — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility — ACER’s competence — Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 — Article 6(10) of Regulation 2019/942 — Article 9(12) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 — Applicable law — Regulation (EU) 2019/943)