Monthly Archives: June 2022

CELEX:62021TJ0315: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 March 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-315/21.

CELEX:62021TJ0316: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 1 June 2022.#Worldwide Machinery Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-316/21.

CELEX:62021TJ0261: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 May 2022.#Manfred Sturz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-261/21.

CELEX:62021TJ0206: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 March 2022.#Oliver Kalita and Christian Haas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-206/21.

CELEX:62021TJ0209: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 February 2022.#Ignacio Carrasco SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-209/21.

CELEX:62020TJ0102: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Case T-102/20.

CELEX:62020TO0454: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 November 2021.#Garment Manufacturers Association in Cambodia v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Common commercial policy – Generalised arrangement of preferential customs tariffs established by Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 – Temporary withdrawal of trade preferences applicable to certain products originating in Cambodia for reason of serious and systematic violations of human rights – Lack of direct concern – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-454/20.

CELEX:62021TJ0125: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Banco de Investimento Global SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-125/21.

CELEX:62021TJ0197: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Lea Nature Services v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-197/21.

CELEX:62021TJ0204: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 March 2022.#Stryker Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-204/21.