CELEX:62019TA0636: Case T-636/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — Chemours Netherlands v ECHA (REACH — Substances of very high concern — Establishment of a candidate list of substances for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Decision identifying 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)propionic acid, its salts and its acyl halides as a substance fulfilling the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list — Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality)

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021TA0149: Case T-149/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — Vitae Health Innovation (VITADHA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark VITADHA — Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62020CA0634: Case C-634/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by A (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Recognition of professional qualifications — Directive 2005/36/EC — Scope — Conditions for obtaining authorisation to pursue the profession of doctor independently in the host Member State — Diploma issued in the home Member State — Right to pursue the profession of doctor limited to a period of three years — Supervision of a licensed doctor and concomitant completion of three years of special training in general medical practice — Articles 45 and 49 TFEU)

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62018TA0540: Case T-540/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — ASL Aviation Holdings and ASL Airlines (Ireland) v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Competition — Markets for international express small package delivery services in the EEA — Concentration — Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market — Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court — General reference to other documents — Pleas in law or complaints raised by a third party in another case — Evidence submitted in the reply — No justification for the delay — Inadmissibility — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62017TA0834: Case T-834/17: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — United Parcel Service v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Competition — Markets for international express small package delivery services in the EEA — Concentration — Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market — Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court — Rights of the defence — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Causal link)

EUR LEX - RSS