CELEX:62021CO0762: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-762/21 P.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CO0761: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-761/21 P.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62022CO0019: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 April 2022.#Sanford LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-19/22 P.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CO0744: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#Henry Cotton’s Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-744/21 P.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CO0743: Order of the Court (chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#Marina Yachting Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-743/21 P.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62020CJ0668: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Y GmbH v Hauptzollamt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Classification of goods – Headings 1302, 3301 and 3302 – Extracted vanilla oleoresin – Excise duties – Directive 92/83/EEC – Exemptions – Article 27(1)(e) – Definition of ‘flavour’ – Directive 92/12/EEC – Excise Committee of the European Commission – Powers.#Case C-668/20.

EUR LEX - RSS

CELEX:62021CJ0150: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#D. B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Mutual recognition – Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA – Enforcement of financial penalties – Article 1(a)(ii) – Decision imposing a financial penalty issued by an administrative authority – Decision open to appeal to a public prosecutor, subject to instructions from the Minister for Justice – Subsequent appeal before a court having jurisdiction in particular in criminal matters.#Case C-150/21.

EUR LEX - RSS