Daily Archives: 24 March, 2022

CELEX:62019CJ0508: Sodba Sodišča (veliki senat) z dne 22. marca 2022.#M. F. proti J. M.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Sąd Najwyższy.#Predhodno odločanje – Člen 267 TFUE – Nujnost zahtevane razlage za to, da bi predložitveno sodišče lahko izdalo sodbo – Pojem – Disciplinski postopek, uveden proti sodniku splošnega sodišča – Določitev disciplinskega sodišča, pristojnega za odločanje v tem postopku, ki jo opravi predsednik disciplinskega senata Sąd Najwyższy (vrhovno sodišče, Poljska) – Civilna tožba za ugotovitev neobstoja delovnega razmerja med predsednikom tega disciplinskega senata in vrhovnim sodiščem – Nepristojnost predložitvenega sodišča za nadzor nad veljavnostjo imenovanja sodnika vrhovnega sodišča in nedopustnost take tožbe v skladu z nacionalnim pravom – Nedopustnost predloga za sprejetje predhodne odločbe.#Zadeva C-508/19.

CELEX:62019CJ0508: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 March 2022.#M.F. v J.M.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Interpretation sought by the referring court necessary to enable it to give judgment – Concept – Disciplinary proceedings brought against a judge of an ordinary court – Designation of the disciplinary court having jurisdiction to hear those proceedings by the President of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Civil action for a declaration that a service relationship does not exist between the President of that disciplinary chamber and the Supreme Court – Lack of jurisdiction of the referring court to review the validity of the appointment of a Supreme Court judge and inadmissibility of such an action under national law – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-508/19.

CELEX:62020TJ0757: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 March 2022.#OT v European Parliament.#Case T-757/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0151: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 March 2022.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Nordzucker AG and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Cartel prosecuted by two national competition authorities – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Non bis in idem principle – Existence of the same offence – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the non bis in idem principle – Conditions – Pursuit of an objective of general interest – Proportionality.#Case C-151/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0117: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 March 2022.#bpost SA v Autorité belge de la concurrence.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Postal services – Tariff system adopted by a universal service provider – Fine imposed by a national postal regulator – Fine imposed by a national competition authority – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Non bis in idem principle – Existence of the same offence – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the non bis in idem principle – Duplication of proceedings and penalties – Conditions – Pursuit of an objective of general interest – Proportionality.#Case C-117/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0117: Sodba Sodišča (veliki senat) z dne 22. marca 2022.#bpost SA proti Autorité belge de la concurrence.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Cour d’appel de Bruxelles.#Predhodno odločanje – Konkurenca – Poštne storitve – Tarifni sistem, ki ga je sprejel izvajalec univerzalnih storitev – Globa, ki jo je naložila nacionalna uprava za regulacijo poštnega sektorja – Globa, ki jo je naložil nacionalni urad za konkurenco – Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah – Člen 50 – Načelo ne bis in idem – Obstoj iste kršitve – Člen 52(1) – Omejitve načela ne bis in idem – Kumulacija postopkov pregona in sankcij – Uresničevanje cilja v splošnem interesu – Sorazmernost.#Zadeva C-117/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0433: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Austro-Mechana Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung mechanisch-musikalischer Urheberrechte Gesellschaft mbH v Strato AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 2 – Reproduction – Article 5(2)(b) – Private copying exception – Concept of ‘any medium’ – Servers owned by third parties made available to natural persons for private use – Fair compensation – National legislation that does not make the providers of cloud computing services subject to the private copying levy.#Case C-433/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0723: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Galapagos BidCo. S.a.r.l. v DE, en tant que liquidateur de Galapagos S.A. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) 2015/848 – Insolvency proceedings – Article 3(1) – International jurisdiction – Moving of the centre of a debtor’s main interests to another Member State after a request to open main insolvency proceedings has been lodged.#Case C-723/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0533: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal v Upfield Hungary Kft.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Provision of food information to consumers – Labelling – Mandatory particulars – List of ingredients – Specific name of those ingredients – Addition of a vitamin to a food – Obligation to indicate the specific name of that vitamin – No obligation to indicate the vitamin formulation used.#Case C-533/20.

CELEX:62020CJ0245: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#X and Z v Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Competence of the supervisory authority – Article 55(3) – Processing operations of courts acting in their judicial capacity – Concept – Making available to a journalist of documents arising from court proceedings containing personal data.#Case C-245/20.