CELEX:62021CO0523: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 16 December 2021.#Innovative Cosmetic Concepts LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-523/21 P. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin28 January, 2022
CELEX:62020CJ0179: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 January 2022.#Fondul Proprietatea SA v Guvernul României and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Case C-179/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin28 January, 2022
CELEX:62020CO0437: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 January 2022.#Criminal proceedings against ZI and TQ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Parma.#Case C-437/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin28 January, 2022
CELEX:62020CJ0179: Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 27. januarja 2022.#Fondul Proprietatea SA proti Guvernul României in drugi.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Predhodno odločanje – Notranji trg električne energije – Direktiva 2009/72/ES – Člen 15(4) – Prednostno razporejanje – Zanesljiva oskrba – Člen 32(1) – Prosti dostop tretjih oseb – Zajamčeni dostop do prenosnih omrežij – Direktiva 2009/28/ES – Člen 16(2) – Zajamčeni dostop – Člen 107(1) PDEU – Člen 108(3) PDEU – Državne pomoči.#Zadeva C-179/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy Admin Zdss P28 January, 2022
CELEX:62020TJ0504: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Soapland GmbH & Co. OHG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-504/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin28 January, 2022
CELEX:62021TO0711(02): Order of the President of the General Court of 30 November 2021.#ID and Others v European Parliament.#Case T-711/21 R. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin28 January, 2022
CELEX:62020TJ0467: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ZARA – Earlier international word mark LE DELIZIE ZARA and earlier national figurative mark ZARA – Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-467/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin28 January, 2022
CELEX:62021TJ0194: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Fidia farmaceutici SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International figurative registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark HYALOSTEL ONE – Earlier EU word mark HYALISTIL and earlier figurative mark HyalOne – Earlier international word mark HYALO – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-194/21. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin28 January, 2022
CELEX:62019TJ0852: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Albéa Services v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ALBÉA – Earlier international registration designating the European Union – Word mark Balea – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Distinctiveness of the earlier international registration designating the European Union – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-852/19. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin28 January, 2022
CELEX:62020CJ0238: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 January 2022.#SIA „Sātiņi-S” v Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 17 – Right to property – Directive 2009/147/EC – Compensation for the damage caused to aquaculture by protected wild birds in a Natura 2000 area – Compensation less than the damage actually suffered – Article 107(1) TFEU – State aid – Concept of ‘advantage’ – Conditions – Regulation (EU) No 717/2014 – De minimis rule.#Case C-238/20. EUR LEX - RSSBy admin28 January, 2022