Daily Archives: 21 January, 2022

CELEX:62021CO0400: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 January 2022.#Asociaţia Naţională de Terapii Complementare din România (ANATECOR) v Primăria Municipiului Arad – Direcţia Venituri and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Arad.#Case C-400/21.

CELEX:62021TO0538: Order of the President of the General Court of 3 November 2021.#Penya Barça Lyon : Plus que des supporters (PBL) and WA v European Commission.#Case T-538/21 R.

CELEX:62020CJ0051: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2022.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Case C-51/20.

CELEX:62019CJ0899: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 January 2022.#Romania v European Commission.#Case C-899/19 P.

CELEX:62020TJ0389: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 July 2021.#KO v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Remuneration – Expatriation allowance – Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Refusal to grant the expatriation allowance – Habitual residence – Period of training.#Case T-389/20.

CELEX:62020TJ0560: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 October 2021.#Yadex International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark PINAR Tam kivaminda Süzme Peynir Yumusacik ve Leziz – Earlier international figurative mark Süzme Peynir – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-560/20.

CELEX:62021TJ0073: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#PIK-KO AD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark P.I.C. Co. – Earlier national figurative mark PIK – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Declaration of partial invalidity.#Case T-73/21.

CELEX:62020TJ0758: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2021.#Monster Energy Co. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word marks MONSTER and MONSTER ENERGY – Genuine use of the marks – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the marks were registered – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Joined Cases T-758/20 and T-759/20.

CELEX:62020TJ0616: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 November 2021.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE ONLY ONE by alphaspirit wild and perfect – Earlier EU word mark ONE – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Res judicata.#Case T-616/20.

CELEX:62020TJ0673: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Celler Lagravera, SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-673/20.